I made an appeal and it was closed prematurely.
Alex Odd's response was
"if u don't agree with complain which was made on ur name - provide your Proves as POV of case and we will review it!"
First off, what POV is needed? There is no video. The person who reported me closed their report and video. They do not wish me punished what so ever. It was a misunderstanding that happened and we figured out the problem. They closed their report. The admin Phani Garcia accepted it within minutes before Seko could close it. There's multiple issues with this, as there was two pages of reports, but yet this report was posted and closed within minutes and I couldn't even defend myself. How am I being punished for a warning when there is no video showing proof of any wrong misdoings? Please re-review this case as it's completely unfair. Thanks.
Here is the video link, which is unavailable:
Alex Odd's response was
"if u don't agree with complain which was made on ur name - provide your Proves as POV of case and we will review it!"
First off, what POV is needed? There is no video. The person who reported me closed their report and video. They do not wish me punished what so ever. It was a misunderstanding that happened and we figured out the problem. They closed their report. The admin Phani Garcia accepted it within minutes before Seko could close it. There's multiple issues with this, as there was two pages of reports, but yet this report was posted and closed within minutes and I couldn't even defend myself. How am I being punished for a warning when there is no video showing proof of any wrong misdoings? Please re-review this case as it's completely unfair. Thanks.
Here is the video link, which is unavailable:
