Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
  • PLEASE PAY ATTTENTION

    Before making complaint with a prefix for curator of the project please read these rules.
    1. Make complaint only in case if you already posted for high admins and they did not help you.
    2. Complaints for curator of the project ONLY for management level complaints. You can't appeal your warning or 7 days ban. You can appeal only permanent or long-term bans.

    Thank you for attention! (c) Mazhor Pluxury
Rejected
Status
Not open for further replies.
Your ID
147766
Players nickname
ayush_stk
Administrators nickname
Yaswanth_Trigger
Date
Oct 15, 2024
Time
5:34
Proofs
https://gta5grand.com/forum/threads/841213/

ayushstk1

Player
Player
Joined
Jun 4, 2024
Messages
37
dear curator,

i am here for thread:- Approved - General Rule 6.2 | 147766 Hassy Davids, Yaswanth Trigger favoring player.

in the thread
first thread owner uploaded this proof 1:- Watch Desktop 2024.10.16 - 10.46.12.16.DVR | Streamable in the proof he clearly done fall RP. and my friend commented that but now proof is different proof 2:- Watch Desktop 2024.10.16 - 10.48.13.19.DVR | Streamable

i have major concern

1.how proof changed after uploading, that doesn't done for us.

2.please check original POV punish for fail RP to Thread owned

3. why thread owner not banned for Gr 6.17,
he was using streamlab software which is open broadcasting software (obs), which can edit recording in real time by separating audio and video while recording, which is strictly prohibited according to Gr 6.17.

4. i want to know that does thread owner punished for off topic talk because my friend is punished for off topic after changing the proof. you can clearly see in ss he done off topic comment.
5. how Yaswanth Trigger have taken thread and decided to punish in just 4 min. a general person can't read that much comment in 4 min and decide.

6.why Hassy Davids punish my friend he was also not a thread admin.
that is not curator forum to give off topic warning. and also that was related to thread.
 

vAnimated

Player
Player
Joined
Nov 19, 2021
Messages
1,233
dear curator,

i am here for thread:- Approved - General Rule 6.2 | 147766 Hassy Davids, Yaswanth Trigger favoring player.

in the thread
first thread owner uploaded this proof 1:- Watch Desktop 2024.10.16 - 10.46.12.16.DVR | Streamable in the proof he clearly done fall RP. and my friend commented that but now proof is different proof 2:- Watch Desktop 2024.10.16 - 10.48.13.19.DVR | Streamable

i have major concern

1.how proof changed after uploading, that doesn't done for us.

2.please check original POV punish for fail RP to Thread owned

3. why thread owner not banned for Gr 6.17,
he was using streamlab software which is open broadcasting software (obs), which can edit recording in real time by separating audio and video while recording, which is strictly prohibited according to Gr 6.17.

4. i want to know that does thread owner punished for off topic talk because my friend is punished for off topic after changing the proof. you can clearly see in ss he done off topic comment.
5. how Yaswanth Trigger have taken thread and decided to punish in just 4 min. a general person can't read that much comment in 4 min and decide.

6.why Hassy Davids punish my friend he was also not a thread admin.
that is not curator forum to give off topic warning. and also that was related to thread.
Again to Lebron Pluxury, not an off topic comment and not a toxic comment. I plan to be on the topic of the forum in accordance to the rules to avoid forum punishment. This is now a spammed forum. A forum was already made for Curator of Project in regards to this same situation and in the Thread Owner's comment he admits "his friend" meaning that once again he is complaining about a forum that has nothing to do with him. My case was already explained in the other forum made for Curator of Project. In regards to the comment he is referring to claiming I did "off topic" is strictly a comment focused on the fact that they are using pov from my livestream to try and get me punished. This complaint has to do with me which is why I have responded in a positive manner, again, the aim of this comment is to remain on topic and not to be toxic in accordance with the rules.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom