Reviewed SR 2.5, GR 6.4 | 99128,135347,141372

[CommanderMalo]

If you want to engage in this debate, I suggest you study the relevant laws yourself. We're not here to spell everything out for you like you're a child. If you need legal clarification, consult your own attorney.

The fact you are the AG and saying this, genuinely and truly scares me. Now that someone finally challenges your BS, you lose your mind here on the forums, instead of taking the time to educate yourself on the law. If you REALLY don't get it, then you should step down.

Otherwise, sit back and enjoy the show. Good day.

 

[Mohil Yami]

Lets check the Lawyers Code 3.4.2 An Organisation Lawyer is contracted to that Organisation and may act as an Attorney and provide all forms of Legal Services on behalf of their "Employer" and their Organisation.

b) An Organisation Lawyer is not required to Contract for Essential Legal Services and may not charge for these services as these are offered free of Charge to "Employees" of their Organisation.
c) An Organisation Lawyer must Contract for Additional Legal Services or Special Legal Services ONLY with "Employees" of their Organisation and may charge a fee for those services.

Where does it say you have to sign a contract with "Employer" as a District Attorney before providing legal service for him ?
Lets look at the definition of Employer and Employee for state organisations in the Labour Law Article 2

2.1.1 An Employer is an individual who has entered into an agreement with an Employee through either an Agreement of Employment or a Contract of Employment.
a) For a State Organisation, the Employer is formally defined as the State, represented by:
i) The Leader of the State Organisation. ii) The Deputy Leaders of the State Organisation.

An Employee is a person who has entered into a term of Employment with their Employer through either an Agreement of Employment or a Contract of Employment

You are talking about respect and language in court, wasn't it Mohil Yami who said "Poppy is talking shit" right in front of 2 judges short time ago and didn't get hold for "Contempt of Court" + Wasn't it Mohil Yami who was blacklisting people without opening a case file or revoking their lawyers license + Wasn't it Mohil Yami who was suspending lawyer without any investigation ? + Wasn't it Mohil Yami deciding on court time on his own without consulting the other side about their availability to that time ?

Every single document against Bam and what was presented inside, is evidence and you can not deny to give that evidence to DA of FIB Leo Malone as per Lawyers Code again + give Leo reasonable time to review it and prepare his own arguments against them.

You guys are absolutely disappointment of Department of Justice, no wonder there is no lawyer and no one wants to be a lawyer while DOJ is under your control.

Here comes someone who doesn't know anything about law and told us lawyers are not supposed to have body cam of their cases and was Blacklisted with proper documentation the only one who poppy has trained them recently like you and leo and many more are not even authorised to be a lawyer so get good.

 

[Mohil Yami]

The fact you are the AG and saying this, genuinely and truly scares me. Now that someone finally challenges your BS, you lose your mind here on the forums, instead of taking the time to educate yourself on the law. If you REALLY don't get it, then you should step down.

Otherwise, sit back and enjoy the show. Good day.

Kids these days xd the one who is posting forums repeatedly is you not me

 

[NoFearEN2]

Here comes someone who doesn't know anything about law and told us lawyers are not supposed to have body cam of their cases and was Blacklisted with proper documentation the only one who poppy has trained them recently like you and leo and many more are not even authorised to be a lawyer so get good.

Imagine after multiple articles from law presented to support the argument but AG "the one supposedly know the laws better than others" here is just talking and responding people with provocative words instead of presenting a single article for his speech.
Don't worry, you are not gonna stay there too long.

 

[Rishav Raj]

Let me get this straight.

In order to even ATTEMPT to come after a state leader, you need an OFPI (Order of First Person Investigation)

Which in turn, if valid, leads to the creation of the case file.

So therefore, if you need THIS document to validate the OTHER document, then both are considered evidence, because you cannot have one without the other.

Nice touch of disrespect by the way, and its not the same forum "again and again" if they keep doing it in every court session. These are 24 hours+ apart, and different situations, warranting different forums.

But naturally, you wouldn't know. Good day, sir.

Ok, are you the person who would decide of something is valid or no? The answer is : NO! Its judges You will only be provided with evidence and case files, You have no authority whatsoever to interpret any meaning of law its for judges to decide + (just like you interpreted completely different meaning of my word “same forum” which is ofcours not correct)about what i know and not lets not go there.

 

[Mohil Yami]

Imagine after multiple articles from law presented to support the argument but AG "the one supposedly know the laws better than others" here is just talking and responding people with provocative words instead of presenting a single article for his speech.
Don't worry, you are not gonna stay there too long.

Try kid many have done it before you and for my articles I have already done in each documents no worries you don't have to take tension of my cases it's better to prepare proofs which you guys are claiming. And I can be anywhere that doesn't have to do anything with my position in Government

 

[Maarsh Walker]

He is the lawyer of FIB he does not need to sign any contract. The only people he can represent are those within FIB. Can you show where in the law it states that he needs to sign a contract with his own org in order to represent them?

so as it seems you do not want to read law and just talk like a puppet i will Point out the LAW - Lawyers code 3.4.2 C clearly states this - An Organisation Lawyer must Contract for Additional Legal Services or Special Legal Services only with Employees of their Organisation and may charge a fee for those services.

So instead of Teaching law to us Read it yourself

 

[CommanderMalo]

so as it seems you do not want to read law and just talk like a puppet i will Point out the LAW - Lawyers code 3.4.2 C clearly states this - An Organisation Lawyer must Contract for Additional Legal Services or Special Legal Services only with Employees of their Organisation and may charge a fee for those services.

So instead of Teaching law to us Read it yourself

My god, how are you even a judge. You speak with such confidence and yet somehow manage to be so incredibly wrong.


Labour code 3.4.2 An Organisation Lawyer is contracted to that Organisation and may act as an Attorney and provide all forms of Legal Services on behalf of their Employer and their Organisation

Unless I suddenly became leader of FIB, which I obviously did not, this makes ME the employee, and BAM the Employer. Bam is my Employer and I am working on behalf of the FIB

c) An Organisation Lawyer must Contract for Additional Legal Services or Special Legal Services only with Employees of their Organisation and may charge a fee for those services.

Bam is NOT an Employee. He is the Employer.

The only thing you guys know from the labour code is blacklisting people, again educate yourselves before speaking here.

Please keep going, I'll continue every time you decide to say something.

 

[NoFearEN2]

My god, how are you even a judge. You speak with such confidence and yet somehow manage to be so incredibly wrong.


Labour code 3.4.2 An Organisation Lawyer is contracted to that Organisation and may act as an Attorney and provide all forms of Legal Services on behalf of their Employer and their Organisation

Unless I suddenly became leader of FIB, which I obviously did not, this makes ME the employee, and BAM the Employer. Bam is my Employer and I am working on behalf of the FIB

c) An Organisation Lawyer must Contract for Additional Legal Services or Special Legal Services only with Employees of their Organisation and may charge a fee for those services.

Bam is NOT an Employee. He is the Employer.

The only thing you guys know from the labour code is blacklisting people, again educate yourselves before speaking here.

Please keep going, I'll continue every time you decide to say something.

As a matter of fact they don't know how to blacklist a person with the appropriate procedure and laws too. So 1-1 = 0

 

[Mohil Yami]

My god, how are you even a judge. You speak with such confidence and yet somehow manage to be so incredibly wrong.


Labour code 3.4.2 An Organisation Lawyer is contracted to that Organisation and may act as an Attorney and provide all forms of Legal Services on behalf of their Employer and their Organisation

Unless I suddenly became leader of FIB, which I obviously did not, this makes ME the employee, and BAM the Employer. Bam is my Employer and I am working on behalf of the FIB

c) An Organisation Lawyer must Contract for Additional Legal Services or Special Legal Services only with Employees of their Organisation and may charge a fee for those services.

Bam is NOT an Employee. He is the Employer.

The only thing you guys know from the labour code is blacklisting people, again educate yourselves before speaking here.

Please keep going, I'll continue every time you decide to say something.

You seem to believe that no contract is needed to represent a client in court, but let me clarify something. Right now, Bam is your client, and to represent him as a legal advisor in court, you must have a signed attorney-client privilege agreement. No lawyer can represent their client without this agreement-it’s fundamental legal knowledge. Oh, but I might have forgotten that you all just follow orders from someone who tells you what to say or do. Must be nice to have someone like that. Anyway, there's no point in explaining it to you here-you wouldn't understand.

 

[Dom Salvatore]

Reviewing...​

 

[Dom Salvatore]

Thread Reviewed
The judges decide which file is to be considered as Case Files and/or evidence
We cannot consider prosecution and the SCJs simply walking out together as corruption

However,
ID 3177 will receive punishment for Mixing ​