Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Your ID
155409
Players nickname
Bam Asiri
Suspect ID
0000
Date of violation
Oct 26, 2024
Time of violation
15:43
Proofs
https://youtu.be/Vg_b0qVq3nU

Bam Asiri

Player
Player
Joined
May 25, 2024
Messages
151
According to 14.3.2, "Suspension or restriction of the immunity status cannot be executed without a valid waiver order issued directly by the Attorney General or by the current Supreme Court Judge or by the Immunity Review Board." The defense did not receive any waiver order, making the immunity suspension invalid, which should have prevented any arrest. Despite this, they proceeded to arrest me. Additionally, 5.3.3 states that a "To arrest a person with full immunity status, a warrant from the Supreme Court or The Immunity Review Board is required to remove this status." yet they did so without a warrant. Furthermore, the judge didn’t even reference me correctly in the verdict, using the name "Bam Zack," a person who doesn’t exist. This oversight alone renders the verdict invalid, as it was not issued for me, Bam Asiri. The SAHP also mishandled the arrest, failing to read my Miranda Rights three times and not following the correct jumpsuit procedures. Altogether, these violations by both the GOV and SAHP make it clear that the arrest was entirely unlawful and invalid.

 

Rishav Raj

Player
Player
Joined
Nov 11, 2022
Messages
1,951
7.4.3 On Grounds of a Technicality in Law. The Principles of both Law and Justice must be applied during a Case and small errors in the procedure or proceedings should not be a point of unnecessary argument.


  1. Minor flaws in a Case File, Procedures or Documentation of the Case cannot be used as Grounds for Termination if those flaws are not significant or material to the Case.
  2. Where required an Objection may be raised by a Lawyer and a Judge shall make a decision as to whether the Technicality in Law is material to the Case.
  3. Where the Evidence is valid and the Court determines that the Proceedings or Procedures are at fault, the Judge shall declare a Mistrial and all issues with the submissions to the Court must be corrected and resubmitted. 🥱
This point is just for that bam zhack thing rest is very self explanatory 🥱
 

Dom Salvatore

Senior State
Senior Administrator
Joined
Jul 20, 2023
Messages
1,208
Thread Reviewed
There was a waiver order. Whether or not it is presented to you is solely at the Judge's discretion, as they determine if a document is to be considered as evidence or part of the case file.

Regarding 5.3.3, you no longer have full immunity since it was lifted according to the waiver order.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom