Reviewed Mass Rule Break | SAHP

[Ahmad Asiri]

At timestamp 0:57, an officer suggests uncuffing the suspect and doing CL to avoid leaving the Ghetto by car or foot, with a gang member reacting "Oh my God" at timestamp 0:58. This was likely overheard by the officers who then intentionally logged out committing CL. At timestamp 1:03, officer ID 163362 uncuffs a suspect with illegal guns, allowing the suspect to escape violating General Rule 6.2. It’s clear that IDs 177759 and 172039 witnessed the corrupt actions of officer ID 163362. By not intervening, they effectively encouraged the corruption thus violating GR 6.4 as well. At timestamp 1:14, both officers, ID 177759 and ID 172039, can be seen committing CL. This POV shows 3 individuals breaking rules resulting in mass rule breaking. Please would also like to request ID 163362 to give the POV as she had the suspect and if she fails to do so then its violation of SR 5.6.

 

[Akash Federal]

Reviewing ​

 

[Viktor Lavrov]

The RP situation wasn't initiated. They had an officer and let him loose and they wished to do a code A, also there is no confirmation the idea to head pop was from SAHP, it would say it was the voice of the gang member.

Also, only 2 did a code A, no demands were given so its not evading rp.
and org warns are for 3+ people committing rule break, here are only 2. Stop targeting org for these.

 

[Alan_Degrey]

At timestamp 0:57, an officer suggests uncuffing the suspect and doing CL to avoid leaving the Ghetto by car or foot, with a gang member reacting "Oh my God" at timestamp 0:58. This was likely overheard by the officers who then intentionally logged out committing CL. At timestamp 1:03, officer ID 163362 uncuffs a suspect with illegal guns, allowing the suspect to escape violating General Rule 6.2. At timestamp 1:14, both officers, ID 177759 and ID 172039, can be seen committing CL. This POV shows 3 individuals breaking rules resulting in mass rule breaking. Please would also like to request ID 163362 to give the POV as she had the suspect and if she fails to do so then its violation of SR 5.6.

Mr. Ahmad, you were not involved in the situation at that time; you were supposed to be involved but didn't, as you didn't take him hostage, and said anything to them, and you guys were gonna take them as a hostage, but didn't take them. You didn't even have cars or enough people. And, also in your POV, the ID of that guy who said to do a code A isn't visible and cannot even be seen who uncuffed a guy or anything. So, my point is that it means SAHP guys weren't even involved in the situation, neither you, then that officer did a code A. I don't think so; it is GR 6.2, and on what basis did you write mass rule break? Huh? Last, the guy who gets involved didn't do a code A (involved in gun fight).

Suggesting you, read the GR 6.2 again (It is forbidden to leave the RP situation by refusing to continue the RP situation)

 

[Alan_Degrey]

And do you really think it is mass rule break?

 

[BiomaskGaming]

Baby needs assistance if to point two ID's or whole of SAHP...LoL

 

[zwckck]

And do you really think it is mass rule break?

Clearly is.

 

[Ahmad Asiri]

Mr. Ahmad, you were not involved in the situation at that time; you were supposed to be involved but didn't, as you didn't take him hostage, and said anything to them, and you guys were gonna take them as a hostage, but didn't take them. You didn't even have cars or enough people. And, also in your POV, the ID of that guy who said to do a code A isn't visible and cannot even be seen who uncuffed a guy or anything. So, my point is that it means SAHP guys weren't even involved in the situation, neither you, then that officer did a code A. I don't think so; it is GR 6.2, and on what basis did you write mass rule break? Huh? Last, the guy who gets involved didn't do a code A (involved in gun fight).

Suggesting you, read the GR 6.2 again (It is forbidden to leave the RP situation by refusing to continue the RP situation)

Please review our points before making unsupported claims. As stated the LEOs had a suspect nearby creating an active situation, and they had no valid reason to leave the game. They cannot use bug abuse to close the game and avoid escaping the Ghetto which would prevent them from being taken hostage and avoid RP, leading to combat logging. The timestamp (1:03 which is also mentioned above) shows the specific officer uncuffing the suspect with two others positioned further away. This clearly violates GR 6.4 for all three of them as they are encouraging corruption, so with three separate rule breaks by three officers it is clear mass rule break. If you're attempting to mislead the admins, I suggest you refrain as they are fully capable of assessing the situation accurately.

 

[Alan_Degrey]

Please review our points before making unsupported claims. As stated the LEOs had a suspect nearby creating an active situation, and they had no valid reason to leave the game. They cannot use bug abuse to close the game and avoid escaping the Ghetto which would prevent them from being taken hostage and avoid RP, leading to combat logging. The timestamp (1:03 which is also mentioned above) shows the specific officer uncuffing the suspect with two others positioned further away. This clearly violates GR 6.4 for all three of them as they are encouraging corruption, so with three separate rule breaks by three officers it is clear mass rule break. If you're attempting to mislead the admins, I suggest you refrain as they are fully capable of assessing the situation accurately.

Mr. Ahmad, fyi, it isn’t seen in your pov who and where they uncuff a 10-15. Is it seen in your POV? 2nd, they cannot leave the game when there is a RP situation going. Have you given them any demands? Did they know you guys were going to take them hostage? You guys had enough people and cars to take the hostage? And before you guys went there, they already did a code A before involving in a situation. And GR 6.4 will only violate in the case of uncuffing, and in your POV, it is not visible where they did uncuff. And gr. 6.2 only when they are in a situation, and according to your perspective, guys who did code were not involved in a situation, and one who gets involved didn't leave the game.

 

[Ahmad Asiri]

Mr. Ahmad, fyi, it isn’t seen in your pov who and where they uncuff a 10-15. Is it seen in your POV? 2nd, they cannot leave the game when there is a RP situation going. Have you given them any demands? Did they know you guys were going to take them hostage? You guys had enough people and cars to take the hostage? And before you guys went there, they already did a code A before involving in a situation. And GR 6.4 will only violate in the case of uncuffing, and in your POV, it is not visible where they did uncuff. And gr. 6.2 only when they are in a situation, and according to your perspective, guys who did code were not involved in a situation, and one who gets involved didn't leave the game.

 

[Viktor Lavrov]

Sheer targeting, find alternative ways to win

 

[Bhuwan Aggarwal]

Reviewing ​

These guys abused on the dead guy.

Request to please ask for extended POV.

Also, this guy was not wearing gang clothes in starting time.

 

[Zee Pluxury]

He is using ge force experience software to record as you can se on top right corner he is not recording mic voice he turned it off please look into this also thanku

 

[Ahmad Asiri]

These guys abused on the dead guy.

Request to please ask for extended POV.

Also, this guy was not wearing gang clothes in starting time.

There’s no abuse toward the downed individual. If you need clarification on gang rules, feel free to join us.

 

[Zee Pluxury]

There’s no abuse toward the downed individual. If you need clarification on gang rules, feel free to join us.

Lmao you npc telling about gang rules to ex bunta leader

 

[nikowebb]

He is using ge force experience software to record as you can se on top right corner he is not recording mic voice he turned it off please look into this also thanku

He’s using push to talk what’s wrong with that???

 

[Zee Pluxury]

He’s using push to talk what’s wrong with that???

Who asked you? And you know by doung this and turning off some overlays its kind of deceiving,edited pov , Gr 6.17

 

[nikowebb]

Who asked you? And you know by doung this and turning off some overlays its kind of deceiving,edited pov , Gr 6.17

Look at this guy getting all kind of hard behind his keyboard

 

[Alan_Degrey]

There’s no abuse toward the downed individual. If you need clarification on gang rules, feel free to join us.

I never been in gangs, but still if you guys are driving gangs car or doing any gang activity, you need to wear the gang clothes, and if you failed to wear 51 percent clothes of gang (Top and Bottom is must), it will fall under GH 1.7. Idk, but if you guys are using the gang radio, you also need to wear the clothes.

 

[nikowebb]

I never been in gangs, but still if you guys are driving gangs car or doing any gang activity, you need to wear the gang clothes, and if you failed to wear 51 percent clothes of gang (Top and Bottom is must), it will fall under GH 1.7. Idk, but if you guys are using the gang radio, you also need to wear the clothes.

nah you only need to wear when doing gang stuff driving cars and using the radio is diff to legal orgs we can use all cars and stuff like that for personal use hope that clears things up