Rejected Mass Rule Break | GOV

[Ahmad Asiri]

In the provided 1st POV, I requested an explanation for why I wasn’t given a lawyer. Officer ID 169710 began explaining, but at timestamp 0:40 Officer ID 57435 interrupted and stopped him. When I asked for his ID at timestamp 1:11 he refused, violating GR 6.4, along with other 2 officers who were encouraging corruption. Later, my doctor took me to PH due to severe injuries, and Officer ID 57435, who wasn't the arresting officer, followed and even instructed my doctor at timestamp 3:20 in 2nd POV not to administer painkillers, interfering with medical procedures. As we left PH for DOC, ID 57435 joined the helicopter as seen in 3rd POV, following us for the rest of the arrest procedure. In the 4th POV at timestamp 0:45, ID 169710 admits that due to his actions, I wouldn’t be provided an attorney, despite availability, and other officers, including IDs 57435 and 174759, encouraged this corruption. Additionally, at timestamp 1:00 ID 169710 breaks RP by doing a sitting animation during a serious conversation with a suspect, violating Fail RP rule.

This second forum post includes extended POVs highlighting instances where ID 57435 was present and/yet refused to show his ID, claiming his position as an excuse, which indicates corruption.

1st POV

2nd POV

3rd POV

4th POV

 

[Bam Asiri]

In the provided 1st POV, I requested an explanation for why I wasn’t given a lawyer. Officer ID 169710 began explaining, but at timestamp 0:40 Officer ID 57435 interrupted and stopped him. When I asked for his ID at timestamp 1:11 he refused, violating GR 6.4, along with other 2 officers who were encouraging corruption. Later, my doctor took me to PH due to severe injuries, and Officer ID 57435, who wasn't the arresting officer, followed and even instructed my doctor at timestamp 3:20 in 2nd POV not to administer painkillers, interfering with medical procedures. As we left PH for DOC, ID 57435 joined the helicopter as seen in 3rd POV, following us for the rest of the arrest procedure. In the 4th POV at timestamp 0:45, ID 169710 admits that due to his actions, I wouldn’t be provided an attorney, despite availability, and other officers, including IDs 57435 and 174759, encouraged this corruption. Additionally, at timestamp 1:00 ID 169710 breaks RP by doing a sitting animation during a serious conversation with a suspect, violating Fail RP rule.

This second forum post includes extended POVs highlighting instances where ID 57435 was present and/yet refused to show his ID, claiming his position as an excuse, which indicates corruption.

1st POV

2nd POV

3rd POV

4th POV

In this Imgur link (

https://imgur.com/a/xqRpYSw

) the admin confirms that even first persons of state must show ID and cannot engage in corruption. In this situation ID 57435 refused to show ID with an invalid excuse "I'm first person of state, you cannot see my ID" and officers ID 169710 and ID 174759 failed to intervene, thereby encouraging the corruption and violating GR 6.4.

 

[Rishav Raj]

The thing is buddy, stop posting cropped POVs
+I told doctor to not give anaesthesia, but instead give pain killers
+Post full POV where lawyer was requested for you and officer told you no lawyer is available and you arguing that you saw a lawyer at capitol.
2) Leos can process you once they requested lawyer and no one responded and they DO NOT need to request again.
3)You should have asked my ID after I Interacted with you and about following its called extra security.
4)He said its a communication mistake not admitted anything stop interpreting things and making your own meaning
5)Why did you cropped the part where lawyer was provided to you when he was available later, are you trying to deceive admins?
​

 

[Yaswanth Trigger]

On Consideration

 

[Yaswanth Trigger]

Upon reviewing the evidence I have decided to Deny this report.

Provided evidence is edited, Will not accept Bits & Pieces of situations.

Still,

1. No sign of asking for Identity of ID 57435 After he actually involved in the procedures + However, in first case as well you clearly saw a guy of same Org showed you his ID which you can use it as further evidence if you wanted to make a case file + No reason was seen to ask Identity of ID 57435 in first Case.

2. Interrupting EMS operations : You can clearly see in your POV itself he gave an explanation.

3. Again a clear explanation of Mis communications given + In your POV at end 2 attorney's showed up so again no point of rule break seen.
​