- Joined
- Jul 24, 2025
- Messages
- 269
First of all, the demands should be considered UB Demands. He wasn’t holding any weapon or aiming at me, he just said “leave the area” and then started shooting. Any random person can’t just say that "Leave the Area" without having anything to scare. He was alone at first then later called his friends. Two of them started shooting without giving any demands, which is clear RDM (G.R. 6.15).
If that is even considered a demand, there was only one person involved in the situation at that time and he was the one who shot me. The other individuals were not present when the situation started, they arrived later and were not part of it. Despite that, they still began shooting at me without being directly involved in what was happening.
After I became unconscious, he kept calling me “madarch*d” again and again in almost every line. This word directly abuses someone’s mother. Using it once maybe can be called slang, but repeating it continuously and directly calling a player with it is straight up abuse. This wasn’t normal talk it was intentional verbal harassment. When a word like this is used repeatedly, it can’t be justified as slang and should be treated as a clear rulebreak.
For Reference:
A similar punishment has already been issued in a similar case and the appeal was rejected by Chief Administrator Pablo Schmidt, confirming that the punishment was correct:
and for Demands and RDM:
If that is even considered a demand, there was only one person involved in the situation at that time and he was the one who shot me. The other individuals were not present when the situation started, they arrived later and were not part of it. Despite that, they still began shooting at me without being directly involved in what was happening.
After I became unconscious, he kept calling me “madarch*d” again and again in almost every line. This word directly abuses someone’s mother. Using it once maybe can be called slang, but repeating it continuously and directly calling a player with it is straight up abuse. This wasn’t normal talk it was intentional verbal harassment. When a word like this is used repeatedly, it can’t be justified as slang and should be treated as a clear rulebreak.
For Reference:
A similar punishment has already been issued in a similar case and the appeal was rejected by Chief Administrator Pablo Schmidt, confirming that the punishment was correct:
Rejected - Ban for Gr 3.2 | Biomask King
Dear Respected Administration Team, I am writing this complaint regarding a 7-day ban issued to me for GR 3.2, which I strongly believe is unfair and based on a biased judgment. I would like to clearly state that I did not intentionally break any server rule. The word that was considered...
gta5grand.com
and for Demands and RDM:
Approved - UB Demand + RDM | 149277
You can clearly see that he killed me without any proper demand he just said 3,2,1 what kind of demand is that please punish this parson accordingly.
gta5grand.com
Last edited:
