Rejected RDM | 71321

[KaanRumi]

Hello, I was fishing on my own boat in the event area. As seen in the POV footage, the player with ID 71321 swam toward my boat and boarded it. Without any prior role-playing interaction or valid RP justification, they suddenly demanded that I leave the area within 5 seconds and began a countdown. I didn’t have time to react, and there was no role-playing context that would justify their claim to this area or such a demand. They counted to one and killed me by shooting me. Since making a baseless demand to attack someone without a valid role-playing scenario violates the rules, this is clearly a case of Random Deathmatch (RDM).
I request that the administration review the footage and issue an appropriate penalty to the player. Thank you.

 

[kaleenbhaiyya]

Hello Admin,

I would like to share my side of the situation.

I was fishing in the event area when I noticed the complainant’s boat. I boarded the boat and continued fishing. While I was engaged in fishing, the complainant suddenly started the boat and drove it into the middle of the ocean, leaving me there. I then returned to the fishing area.


After returning, I asked the complainant why they had done that, but they did not respond or say anything. Before I fired any shots, I gave a clear demand for the player to leave the area and started a countdown. I did not immediately shoot without any interaction.

The POV submitted by the complainant is incomplete and only shows the second half of the incident. It does not include the part where they drove me away from the fishing area by taking me into the middle of the ocean or the interaction that happened before the shooting. Because of this, the submitted POV does not show the full context of what occurred.

I kindly request the administration to review the complete evidence and both POVs before making a decision.

 

[KaanRumi]

Hello Admin,

The suspect's claims are completely false and fabricated in an attempt to avoid punishment.

First, as you can clearly see and hear in my provided POV, the suspect swims to my boat, climbs on, and immediately says, "bro, leave this area in 5 seconds," followed by a countdown. He never asks, "why did you do that," as he falsely claims in his defense. My video captures the entire interaction.

Second, there was no prior interaction, and I did not drive him to the middle of the ocean. If the suspect claims there was a prior RP situation that justifies his actions, the burden of proof is on him. He must provide his own POV to back up these accusations. Since he has no POV, his claims are entirely baseless.

Lastly, even if his fabricated scenario were true, giving a 5-second countdown to a player to leave a public event/fishing area and shooting them is not a valid RP reason. This is still a clear violation of the rules and falls under RDM.

I request the administration to evaluate the situation based on the concrete video evidence provided rather than baseless verbal claims. Thank you.

 

[kaleenbhaiyya]

Hello Admin,

I would like to respond to the complainant’s latest statement.

The complainant is claiming that my version is fabricated, but that is not true. The POV they submitted does not show the complete sequence of events. It only starts from the moment I returned and gave the demand. It does not include what happened before that.

Before this incident, while I was fishing on the complainant’s boat, they started the boat and took me away from the fishing area, leaving me in the middle of the ocean. I returned to the fishing area afterward. This is why I approached them again. The complainant’s POV begins after these events, so it does not prove that nothing happened beforehand.

The complainant also states that I never asked them why they did that. However, a POV that starts in the middle of an incident cannot be used to claim that no previous interaction took place. Their recording is incomplete and does not capture the entire situation.

Furthermore, I did not immediately shoot the complainant. I first gave a verbal demand and a countdown before taking any action. This was not a random, instant attack without any interaction.

243166 bro show full pov

I respectfully request the administration to consider that the complainant’s POV does not show the full context of the incident. A decision should not be based on an incomplete recording alone.

 

[KaanRumi]

Hello Admin,

I will keep this brief as the suspect is simply repeating the same baseless claims without providing a single piece of evidence.

1. Burden of Proof: The suspect claims there was a prior situation. According to server rules, if a player claims a prior RP situation justifies their actions, they must provide their own POV to prove it. He has provided nothing but a fabricated story.
2. Invalid RP Reason: Even if we pretend his story is true (which it is not), someone allegedly driving a boat away does not give you the right to return later, jump on their boat, give a 5-second countdown to leave a public fishing zone, and execute them. There is no valid RP reason here. This is classic RDM.
3. The POV is Sufficient: My POV is 1 minute long and clearly shows the suspect swimming to my boat, the entire "interaction" (which was just his illegal 5-second demand), and the murder. It shows the complete context of his rule break. I am not required to upload a 10-minute video of me just fishing because he decided to invent a background story to avoid a warning.

I trust the administration will make their decision based on the actual video evidence provided, not on imaginary scenarios. Thank you for your time.

 

[kaleenbhaiyya]

Show the full pov

 

[KaanRumi]

I already provided a clear POV showing the entire interaction and your rule break. If you claim something else happened beforehand, the server rules require you to provide your own POV to prove it.

I will not upload a longer video just because you fabricated a story to avoid a penalty. Stop spamming the thread and wait for the admin's decision.

 

[kaleenbhaiyya]

The complainant keeps claiming that their POV shows the entire incident, but I respectfully disagree.

If the complainant believes their recording contains the complete sequence of events, then I kindly request them to upload at least 1 minute before the clip they have submitted. That would provide the administration with the full context instead of only a selected portion of the incident.

I have already explained my side of the situation. I am not fabricating any story to avoid punishment. I respectfully request the administration to review the complete evidence and make a fair decision based on the full context rather than an incomplete clip.

 

[Chief Normen]

On Consideration​

 

[Chief Normen]

Upon reviewing the evidence I have decided to Deny this report

Incorrect Title Mention
Mention Correct rulebreak

Correct it and file new complaint
Please Refer to the Rules for Filing a complaint
And file a new complaint​