Reviewed [K] Pov Request | 441539

[Sayko 👻]

I think he is using an aimbot so i would like to see his POV from before he entered yellow zone and from moment he killed me i also request that his POV be reviewed by PC Checker.

 

[Kayess Exe]

Reviewing…​

 

[Kayess Exe]

Requesting POV

ID 441539 has 12 hours to provide POV of this event
​

 

[Nine Serenities]

Hello,
Player ID 441539 is currently offline, but I have access to his POV recording. POV:

Regarding the concern about how you were eliminated, we request that the reviewing administrator carefully listen to the audio in the provided POV. At Timestamp: 1:50, it is evident that there were two or more players firing at you simultaneously. Additionally, the video clearly shows that ID 441539 only dealt a total of 30 damage (15 + 15), indicating that multiple sources of damage contributed to your elimination.
We would also appreciate clarification from the administrator reviewing this report regarding the use of Q-peeking while firing inside an event zone, specifically during State Control.

• If Q-peeking is permitted in this event, then there should be no issue regarding the engagement.
• If Q-peeking is not permitted, then we respectfully request that this be addressed, as ID 338985 can be seen Q-peeking and firing at us, which is clearly visible and registered in his POV at Timestamp: 00:55

We respectfully request that the admin take these points into account and provide a clear interpretation of the rule so similar situations can be avoided in the future.

 

[Sayko 👻]

Hello,
Player ID 441539 is currently offline, but I have access to his POV recording. POV:

Regarding the concern about how you were eliminated, we request that the reviewing administrator carefully listen to the audio in the provided POV. At Timestamp: 1:50, it is evident that there were two or more players firing at you simultaneously. Additionally, the video clearly shows that ID 441539 only dealt a total of 30 damage (15 + 15), indicating that multiple sources of damage contributed to your elimination.
We would also appreciate clarification from the administrator reviewing this report regarding the use of Q-peeking while firing inside an event zone, specifically during State Control.

• If Q-peeking is permitted in this event, then there should be no issue regarding the engagement.
• If Q-peeking is not permitted, then we respectfully request that this be addressed, as ID 338985 can be seen Q-peeking and firing at us, which is clearly visible and registered in his POV at Timestamp: 00:55

We respectfully request that the admin take these points into account and provide a clear interpretation of the rule so similar situations can be avoided in the future.

there is no rule about people cannot use q peek or somethink so there is no rule break

 

[Nine Serenities]

It is considered a bug abuse in some events because when he shot you with a revolver, you didn't get any damage. Though your body was visible and the crosshair was on you, no damage was registered. Until you decided to leave your Q peek, you didn't receive any damage. If any player decides to use Q-peek and shoot without aiming (Holding right click), it's basically you taking cover, where only you can shoot them, and the other party cannot shoot you back. Care to explain that?

 

[Sayko 👻]

It is considered a bug abuse in some events because when he shot you with a revolver, you didn't get any damage. Though your body was visible and the crosshair was on you, no damage was registered. Until you decided to leave your Q peek, you didn't receive any damage. If any player decides to use Q-peek and shoot without aiming (Holding right click), it's basically you taking cover, where only you can shoot them, and the other party cannot shoot you back. Care to explain that?

his missing first revo shoot also if its bug abuse your own players doing q peek at sec 1:30 u can cleary see

 

[Kayess Exe]

Reviewed

ID 441539 has been reviewed. Q Peak is game function, and we do not issue punishments for game functions.
Thread closed after review.
​