The POV's of this complaint are cut: On consideration - [TR] Gr. 3.1 & 3.2 | ID 136495
He is manupulating evidence and is metagaming himself. I do not understand that he is not getting punished for metagaming because the pov I shared is his.
How else can I proof metagaming?
You can see in the video that they are telling in Turkish to come to a certain location via Discord. Even the Discord opens and these players are meta-gaming.
This proof is from a complaint that has been shared against me, but it is very clear that this is the only way I can proof that he is...
Clearly meta gaming and teaming with other people to gain advantage for printing machine.
Live stream on in discord, communicating “kill them” and nog even family radio on.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.