- Joined
- Dec 27, 2023
- Messages
- 21
Hey Senior Admins, We were engaged in a RP situation at DOC and then Abo Saif came there to clarify some things and told us that if lawyer says that you have to release we have so release otherwise its GR 6.4, however according to the legislation that has been approved lawyer can only give suggestions and the final decision is on the arresting officer so that is not GR 6.4, So Abo Saif Intervene in a RP situation and told us to let the suspect go free which is a misinformation and that ruined our RP situation. I have given the link of POV when abo saif came and left aswell as proof from legislation that has been approved and I didnt knew what to add in type of punishment so I added Warn.
In the Last Paragraph of the 10th Page of Public Servants Governance Act 7th Rendition,
State-appointed legal representatives, upon the evidence’s validity incriminating the suspect, but they can only present their lawful wish to the officer, which the arresting officer can comply or deny with their own discretion of the evidence. Private attorneys or high command (for officers) may present arguments, but the arresting officer’s decision is final. Attorneys may seek a subpoena to challenge the decision.
This is the exact words from Legislation then how is that GR 6.4, we are following RP.
In the Last Paragraph of the 10th Page of Public Servants Governance Act 7th Rendition,
State-appointed legal representatives, upon the evidence’s validity incriminating the suspect, but they can only present their lawful wish to the officer, which the arresting officer can comply or deny with their own discretion of the evidence. Private attorneys or high command (for officers) may present arguments, but the arresting officer’s decision is final. Attorneys may seek a subpoena to challenge the decision.
This is the exact words from Legislation then how is that GR 6.4, we are following RP.
