ive been warned for fearrp/failrp in a matter that doesnt even make sense.
in the forum that is attached, i reported a player in regards to him shooting inside of the greenzone (being the unscripted gz of black market). in hopes that he would get punished for what was CLEARLY him player shooting inside of the greenzone, it somehow backfired on me and resulted in me getting a punishment for fearrp/failrp. in the explanation that administrator tyrell johnson provided me with in accordance to my punishment, he mentioned how LEOs (including the fib officer involved in this incident) ARE allowed to shoot in a greenzone whenever the situation deems credit. however, in the pov i provided, i'm very confident when i say that my character did not do OR cause any actions which could lead to the fib officer into shooting at me, yet alone giving him and exemption to SHOOTING at ME inside of the greenzone.
after being met with the punishment i got, i looked at the thread attached only to see tyrell's main arguments were that LEOs were allowed to shoot in greenzones whenever a situation requires them to, and my character's driving with respect to the fearrp rule. the thing is, the fib officer was NOT in a situation which required him to full on chase me into the ghetto through the black market all whilst shooting me in the process. I may have said something along the lines of "imma shoot your ass" but im 100% sure an officer wouldnt run straight towards a criminal in a car who is going into the ghetto all because the criminal said he was gonna kill him. because an officer in a situation like this would highly be suggested to request another officer for his safety, i think HIS actions should be deemed as fail/fear rp, as opposed to mine where im "driving towards a person whos shooting me". I wasnt driving towards him to break the rules of fear / fail rp, I didnt drive towards him shooting me (in fact, i drove away from him), and it doesnt make sense how tyrell just completely disregarded the fact that he was blatantly shooting at me INSIDE of the GREENZONE.
in the full bodycam i have provided (youtube link), it shows me killing the fib officer inside of the greenzone (which i am fully accountable for, currently serving a warning for it). it also shows another administrator dealing with our situation and showcases the fib officer not being accountable for his actions at all and decieving the admin in a way. im clearly accountable as I acknowledge that im sorry for shooting inside of the greenzone, all whilst the fib officer deliberately shoves all censure to me. the following time stamps show the player:
1:45 - 2:20 - immediately shifts the blame on me once he realizes saturo witnessed me killing him, not admitting to him also shooting inside of the greenzone
3:20 - 3:35 - tries to convince saturo that im responsible for a shootout that is near our admin situation (he deemed it as: "hes distorting our admin situation")
it doesnt make any sense to me how im seen fully in the wrong in this situation. Tyrell johnson completely disregarded the fact that the offender broke the gz rule and actually became his saviour with an excuse that had the context of "oh yeah, im a leo, therefore I can break the greenzone rule and get away with it squeaky clean!!". I also asked tyrell where it said that LEOs are exempt from doing this and he said to look through state rules which I did not find whatsoever. not to mentionhow the officer also ran into the black market all by HIMSELF on DUTY in response to someone saying that he'll die. that has the context of "i dont need other officers in order to live, i have a 100% chance of surviving this situation anyways! and who cares if i die too, i can always just respawn in 5 minutes!!!" but would an officer irl really chase a suspect into the ghetto by himself after being threatened? i dont think so.
the offender is also clearly in the wrong and it doesnt make sense on how hes just getting away with this. hes CLEARLY shooting in the greenzone in a situation that shouldnt even have been a thing. he shouldnt even had ran into the black market to begin with, yet alone shoot at me. but nah, its all good cuz hes a leo and that exempts him from breaking rules like what tyrone said.
in the forum that is attached, i reported a player in regards to him shooting inside of the greenzone (being the unscripted gz of black market). in hopes that he would get punished for what was CLEARLY him player shooting inside of the greenzone, it somehow backfired on me and resulted in me getting a punishment for fearrp/failrp. in the explanation that administrator tyrell johnson provided me with in accordance to my punishment, he mentioned how LEOs (including the fib officer involved in this incident) ARE allowed to shoot in a greenzone whenever the situation deems credit. however, in the pov i provided, i'm very confident when i say that my character did not do OR cause any actions which could lead to the fib officer into shooting at me, yet alone giving him and exemption to SHOOTING at ME inside of the greenzone.
after being met with the punishment i got, i looked at the thread attached only to see tyrell's main arguments were that LEOs were allowed to shoot in greenzones whenever a situation requires them to, and my character's driving with respect to the fearrp rule. the thing is, the fib officer was NOT in a situation which required him to full on chase me into the ghetto through the black market all whilst shooting me in the process. I may have said something along the lines of "imma shoot your ass" but im 100% sure an officer wouldnt run straight towards a criminal in a car who is going into the ghetto all because the criminal said he was gonna kill him. because an officer in a situation like this would highly be suggested to request another officer for his safety, i think HIS actions should be deemed as fail/fear rp, as opposed to mine where im "driving towards a person whos shooting me". I wasnt driving towards him to break the rules of fear / fail rp, I didnt drive towards him shooting me (in fact, i drove away from him), and it doesnt make sense how tyrell just completely disregarded the fact that he was blatantly shooting at me INSIDE of the GREENZONE.
in the full bodycam i have provided (youtube link), it shows me killing the fib officer inside of the greenzone (which i am fully accountable for, currently serving a warning for it). it also shows another administrator dealing with our situation and showcases the fib officer not being accountable for his actions at all and decieving the admin in a way. im clearly accountable as I acknowledge that im sorry for shooting inside of the greenzone, all whilst the fib officer deliberately shoves all censure to me. the following time stamps show the player:
1:45 - 2:20 - immediately shifts the blame on me once he realizes saturo witnessed me killing him, not admitting to him also shooting inside of the greenzone
3:20 - 3:35 - tries to convince saturo that im responsible for a shootout that is near our admin situation (he deemed it as: "hes distorting our admin situation")
it doesnt make any sense to me how im seen fully in the wrong in this situation. Tyrell johnson completely disregarded the fact that the offender broke the gz rule and actually became his saviour with an excuse that had the context of "oh yeah, im a leo, therefore I can break the greenzone rule and get away with it squeaky clean!!". I also asked tyrell where it said that LEOs are exempt from doing this and he said to look through state rules which I did not find whatsoever. not to mentionhow the officer also ran into the black market all by HIMSELF on DUTY in response to someone saying that he'll die. that has the context of "i dont need other officers in order to live, i have a 100% chance of surviving this situation anyways! and who cares if i die too, i can always just respawn in 5 minutes!!!" but would an officer irl really chase a suspect into the ghetto by himself after being threatened? i dont think so.
the offender is also clearly in the wrong and it doesnt make sense on how hes just getting away with this. hes CLEARLY shooting in the greenzone in a situation that shouldnt even have been a thing. he shouldnt even had ran into the black market to begin with, yet alone shoot at me. but nah, its all good cuz hes a leo and that exempts him from breaking rules like what tyrone said.
