Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Your ID
199634
Players nickname
gustavo alejandro
Suspect ID
198587
Date of violation
Jul 4, 2025
Time of violation
4:00
Proofs
https://youtu.be/HMsaAvIqxPw

Meetpatel1883

Player
Player
Joined
Apr 9, 2025
Messages
3
Dear Admin,

I hope you are doing well.

I would like to respectfully present my clarification regarding the POV submitted against me.

As shown in the POV, the situation occurred at exactly 4:00 o’clock, during which I was in the process of collecting drugs. You can clearly observe the in-game time in the POV. I would like to clarify that at 4:00, the focus was on collecting drugs, and in such a scenario, issuing a demand was not necessary or appropriate. My actions were based on the live context and surroundings, where I prioritized the ongoing situation over formal initiation.

Additionally, the POV clearly captures continuous gunfire prior to my engagement, indicating that a shootout was already in progress. Based on what I heard and perceived in real time, I responded accordingly, making a practical and situational RP decision. In such conditions, giving a demand would have been both unsafe and unrealistic.

I would also like to raise a concern about
possible metagaming by the opposing party. It appears that they engaged in IC to OOC metagaming, where in-character events or actions were reacted to or discussed from an out-of-character perspective. This kind of behavior breaks immersion and violates RP rules, and I kindly request this be reviewed as part of the overall incident.

For full transparency, I also suggest requesting and reviewing the complete POV from the other party, covering the moments before the shooting began.

Thank you for taking the time to review this matter. I am available for any further questions or clarification if needed.

Sincerely,
Patel Slayers
 

Meetpatel1883

Player
Player
Joined
Apr 9, 2025
Messages
3
Respected Admin,

I hope you're having a good day.

In continuation of my previous message, I would like to respectfully add one more clarification.

In the POV submitted by the opposing party, there is gunfire already occurring in the background before my engagement. While the volume of the gunfire may be relatively low, I kindly request that the POV be carefully reviewed, as the sound is present and is an important context to the situation.

My actions were based on real-time perception of the ongoing conflict, and I reacted accordingly to what I heard and assessed in the moment.

Thank you once again for your time and fair consideration. I remain available should any further clarification be required.

Sincerely,
Patel Slayers
 

Babi Ruthless

𝒾 π’žπ’Άπ“ƒ π’Ÿπ‘œ π“‰π’½π’Ύπ“ˆ π’œπ“π“ π’Ÿπ’Άπ“Ž
Server Administrator
Joined
Mar 10, 2024
Messages
3,196
On consideration
 

Babi Ruthless

𝒾 π’žπ’Άπ“ƒ π’Ÿπ‘œ π“‰π’½π’Ύπ“ˆ π’œπ“π“ π’Ÿπ’Άπ“Ž
Server Administrator
Joined
Mar 10, 2024
Messages
3,196
Upon reviewing the evidence I have decided to Accept this report
ID 198587 will be punished For Gen rule 6.15
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom