- Joined
- Jul 30, 2025
- Messages
- 6
Reason for Complaint:
First of all, I would like to mention that I have utmost respect for Admin Razwad Rogue's rejection decision on my report. However, I believe the scenario has been misinterpreted and should be re-examined with clarification, as it falls under GR 1.6 and real-life activity.
The report I submitted was a player IRL (real-life) behavior report regarding Grand RP, which explicitly violates:
GR 1.6 – Exchange of game values (accounts, money, property, etc.) for real money or bartering for other game property is not allowed.
This conversation did not take place in-game. The discussion and actions were all out-of-game, and I gathered real-life evidence accordingly. The report was rejected with the grounds "invalid evidence – third-party/OOC chat," yet this response is more relevant for in-character (IC) matters — not IRL offenses like those under GR 1.6.
Evidence Submitted:
Chat evidence (WhatsApp/Instagram):
Video evidence (player revealing in-game account/family access):
Note:
If you read the chat screenshots and then watch the video, you can clearly see that the individual is discussing his own Grand RP account, and the in-game ID is shown in the video. This ties the IRL activity directly to an in-game identity and confirms the GR 1.6 violation.
My Request:
I respectfully request that this report be re-examined, with the knowledge that GR 1.6 is IRL activity, and by definition, it requires IRL evidence. This was never an IC complaint. If necessary, I request that the matter be taken to senior administration for an impartial resolution.
Original Complaint Link:
First of all, I would like to mention that I have utmost respect for Admin Razwad Rogue's rejection decision on my report. However, I believe the scenario has been misinterpreted and should be re-examined with clarification, as it falls under GR 1.6 and real-life activity.
The report I submitted was a player IRL (real-life) behavior report regarding Grand RP, which explicitly violates:
GR 1.6 – Exchange of game values (accounts, money, property, etc.) for real money or bartering for other game property is not allowed.
This conversation did not take place in-game. The discussion and actions were all out-of-game, and I gathered real-life evidence accordingly. The report was rejected with the grounds "invalid evidence – third-party/OOC chat," yet this response is more relevant for in-character (IC) matters — not IRL offenses like those under GR 1.6.
Evidence Submitted:
Chat evidence (WhatsApp/Instagram):
Video evidence (player revealing in-game account/family access):
Note:
If you read the chat screenshots and then watch the video, you can clearly see that the individual is discussing his own Grand RP account, and the in-game ID is shown in the video. This ties the IRL activity directly to an in-game identity and confirms the GR 1.6 violation.
My Request:
I respectfully request that this report be re-examined, with the knowledge that GR 1.6 is IRL activity, and by definition, it requires IRL evidence. This was never an IC complaint. If necessary, I request that the matter be taken to senior administration for an impartial resolution.
Original Complaint Link:
Rejected - GR 1.6 | ID 165719
I want to report the player with ID 165719 At this address for trying to sell cash for real cash. The player spoke to me on Instagram and said he could give me in-game money from a family account for real world cash. He sent video which showed very clearly how he accesses the family account -...
gta5grand.com
