Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
  • PLEASE PAY ATTTENTION

    Before making complaint with a prefix for curator of the project please read these rules.
    1. Make complaint only in case if you already posted for high admins and they did not help you.
    2. Complaints for curator of the project ONLY for management level complaints. You can't appeal your warning or 7 days ban. You can appeal only permanent or long-term bans.

    Thank you for attention! (c) Mazhor Pluxury
Rejected
Status
Not open for further replies.
Your ID
387027
Players nickname
Billu Boxar
Administrators nickname
Cayman Panch
Date
Sep 7, 2025
Time
00:00
Proofs
https://ibb.co/Cpp31byk

Billu boxar

Player
Player
Joined
May 28, 2024
Messages
162
Hello, Lebron. Or, if possible, can you have a look into this, please? Thank you.

I was banned for deceiving admins around 5 days ago. Again, I already posted appeal 2 times, which was rejected by Mohamed and Jonny . I would like you to have a look at both my appeals to understand the situation .In the last appeal, Jonny said I deleted some messages from my IC wife's logs. Let me explain this also completely what was the exact situation. First of all, let me clear this up: the unit was at rank 5 in the National Guard. There was a one-HR unit whose message is in her logs. The message is here: Screenshot-9784 hosted at ImgBB here All conversation took place, and then Marcus DM'd me this: Marcus-New-1 hosted at ImgBB He told me to fix this and i did fixed all the thing since i never favor her. If you see ss first, it's clear. HR and MP are free to check these logs, and Marcus DM'd regarding this and told me to fix things, and he said you are favoring her, but I said no. He said you give her permission to wear any uniform. I have already explained the uniform thing in my first appeal here Rejected - Ban for deceiving I Cayman Panch , so you can check this. I told Marcus the unit is getting the same treatment as the Karl a Ng unit, the same in the org, but then the senior curator off-state DM'd me. Do you have any problem? I said yes. Chat SS here: Screenshot-9798 hosted at ImgBB Screenshot-9799 hosted at ImgBB
Imagine a person messaging first on his own and then later banning me for deceiving. Simply, he asked me what the issue was, and I gave my opinion. How could this be deceiving? Then I get to know I deleted some messages from my wife's logs, and that's why I was banned. "Interesting," I said over there. "I will be deleting the conversation from these logs, and it is a very basic thing. You are not allowed to chat in someone's unit logs. If you do so, HC will come and clear the conversation (NG). Why do we have audit logs then?" If I want to hide this, only I even have access to audit logs. Why did I not delete that message? Because my intentions were never wrong. del-msg-3 hosted at ImgBB See, here is proof I said I am deleting the message, for example. Screenshot-9794 hosted at ImgBB You can clearly see what this guy has done, the same as me. Because it's allowed. If that's the case, then why are they not getting banned? I have made minor mistakes, maybe, but I am sure I have not done anything that gives me a 30-day ban. I have been 2 org leaders and an admin assistant. See, how would I not know this? You can see I deleted only the conversation; the relevant part was still there, which should be there.Screenshot-9784 hosted at ImgBB That's why I want to have higher admin review it again. Review this file, please. I don't deserve a ban for this. How would I know this is not allowed? Neither the curator nor any rules state this. Have a look into this matter.
mostly the proofs are of dm because i was banned for this reason only on the basics of dm so please take this in consideration.
 

Alex Odd

Chief Administrator
Chief Administrator
Joined
Apr 28, 2021
Messages
17,793
Jonny and Mohammed have fully verified your case and gave you perfectly correct response , you tried to deceive and have received punishment for deceiving - punishment is perfectly correct ! As deleting Part of conversation for sure was not made "unintentionally"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom