Rejected Wrong Decision | Marcus Phogat

[Christian Dodge]

This complaint, Rejected - GR 6.16 & GR 1.12 | ID: 302574, does not appear to have been handled correctly, based on the accused administrator's wording in his judgement and the way the rule is worded:

For GR 6.16, he did not rob you as Person. If he did, then 6.16 will apply!

Per GR 6.16, it very clearly says it includes "robbery of person, armoured car, trucks (any kind of transport):"

6.16 During robbery of person, armoured car, trucks (any kind of transport) must be atleast 2 cars and 4 persons to stop them and rob. In case if they did not stop it is considered as "Power Gaming" | Jail 120 min or WARN

If it does not cover "trucks (any kind of transport)," why list them specifically in a list for GR 6.16? Clearly it is intentionally there to include transportation of any kind, including my car, for the robbery rule. It makes no sense to be explicitly written there otherwise.

 

[Jonny Odds]

Rejected

Answer was given by the administrator. For the Car Theft theres no need for GR6.16 requirements.