- Joined
- Feb 20, 2024
- Messages
- 46
Admin’s name i complaining about: Avanshh Yadav
Date & Time of situation: Sep 24, 2025 – around 14:00 (server time)
Proof for thread 1141478 Watch Untitled video - Made with Clipchamp (1) | Streamable (Rejected ID of thread owner is not visible in the POV)
Proof for thread 1141566 Watch Untitled video - Made with Clipchamp (2) | Streamable (with Owner ID visible) + Link to original complaint (Rejected Seems unintentional)
Description of Situation:
I would like to file a complaint against Administrator Avanshh Yadav for mishandling my player complaint. Despite providing clear video evidence showing Player ID 7784 intentionally ramming into my vehicle multiple times inside the Green Zone (a direct violation of server rules), the administrator rejected the report, stating that it "seems unintentional."
This response disregards the repeated actions captured in the video and appears to minimize or cover the rule violation committed by Player 7784. Administrators should enforce rules fairly and consistently, but in this case, the decision seems biased and dismissive of the provided proof.
Requested Action:
I request a fair review of my case by higher administration and an investigation into the handling of this complaint, as it feels like the administrator attempted to cover up the mistake of the reported player instead of enforcing the rules properly.
Date & Time of situation: Sep 24, 2025 – around 14:00 (server time)
Proof for thread 1141478 Watch Untitled video - Made with Clipchamp (1) | Streamable (Rejected ID of thread owner is not visible in the POV)
Proof for thread 1141566 Watch Untitled video - Made with Clipchamp (2) | Streamable (with Owner ID visible) + Link to original complaint (Rejected Seems unintentional)
Description of Situation:
I would like to file a complaint against Administrator Avanshh Yadav for mishandling my player complaint. Despite providing clear video evidence showing Player ID 7784 intentionally ramming into my vehicle multiple times inside the Green Zone (a direct violation of server rules), the administrator rejected the report, stating that it "seems unintentional."
This response disregards the repeated actions captured in the video and appears to minimize or cover the rule violation committed by Player 7784. Administrators should enforce rules fairly and consistently, but in this case, the decision seems biased and dismissive of the provided proof.
Requested Action:
I request a fair review of my case by higher administration and an investigation into the handling of this complaint, as it feels like the administrator attempted to cover up the mistake of the reported player instead of enforcing the rules properly.
