- Joined
- Aug 26, 2022
- Messages
- 146
Your ID: 37243
Players Name: Marie Panda
The name of the Admin who rejectet my Report: Detlef Panther
What sanction did you get, how high was the sentence?
What happend: Hi, admin Detlef Panther rejected my report for two reasons. The first reason is that it wasn't uploaded according to the template, which isn't true. The video doesn't necessarily have to be included in the entire description to be visible; it has to be inserted as proof, which I have done in this case.
Link from report: Rejected - Dach Ink Ballas
Links to other reports of mine that are written in the same way and were accepted.
1. Approved - MK
2. Approved - OOC Talk / Baiting / Beleidigung
3. Approved - CL + OOC Beleidigung
4. Approved - Baiting
This could therefore not have led to the rejection of the application.
In his second statement, he said that no ID could be identified. Which isn't entirely true. My mate who was walking in front of me (ID 108602)
He was killed from that roof, if you look and listen closely. And since there was only one person on that roof, it could only have been ID 110745.
You can also see in the clip that he's shooting on the roof and my mate dies at that moment.
No POV was requested; instead, it was directly rejected, with a definitely incorrect justification.
That's why I'd like someone else to take a closer look at it. Thank you.
LG Marie
Players Name: Marie Panda
The name of the Admin who rejectet my Report: Detlef Panther
What sanction did you get, how high was the sentence?
What happend: Hi, admin Detlef Panther rejected my report for two reasons. The first reason is that it wasn't uploaded according to the template, which isn't true. The video doesn't necessarily have to be included in the entire description to be visible; it has to be inserted as proof, which I have done in this case.
Link from report: Rejected - Dach Ink Ballas
Links to other reports of mine that are written in the same way and were accepted.
1. Approved - MK
2. Approved - OOC Talk / Baiting / Beleidigung
3. Approved - CL + OOC Beleidigung
4. Approved - Baiting
This could therefore not have led to the rejection of the application.
In his second statement, he said that no ID could be identified. Which isn't entirely true. My mate who was walking in front of me (ID 108602)
He was killed from that roof, if you look and listen closely. And since there was only one person on that roof, it could only have been ID 110745.
You can also see in the clip that he's shooting on the roof and my mate dies at that moment.
No POV was requested; instead, it was directly rejected, with a definitely incorrect justification.
That's why I'd like someone else to take a closer look at it. Thank you.
LG Marie
