Rejected Evaluation edited retrospectively, Spreading Misinformation, and Unfair Assessment | Arnold vonRichter | 277528

[Logan Bennett]

Hello Lebron,

i hereby request an investigation regarding my admin complaint dated January 28, 2026.

» Reason
Arnold vonRichter rejected my admin complaint against Timo Lachluli on the grounds that I could have engine-blocked the suspect. However, this information is false. The USSS has never had access to an engine blocker, which is why I am questioning how the Curator of the Administration can make such a statement.

Furthermore, I am wondering why Arnold vonRichter edited his message after I had already created a ticket and has now come up with a new justification.

• I am requesting a detailed investigation into why Arnold vonRichter edited his message in the admin complaint after I created a ticket.
• I also question why the Curator of the Administration is spreading false information and claiming that I, as a USSS member, could have used an engine blocker.
• I also wonder how I could have acted differently and why no goodwill was extended in this case.

With this measure, Arnold VonRichter seems to have been looking for a reason to dismiss my administrative complaint. Furthermore, the sanction is completely unjustified, especially since practically every official on the DE01 server does the same thing and many suspects even use anti-radar devices. We can hardly say to the suspect: “Stop, or we'll... well, we're not allowed to do anything anyway.”

» Relevant forum post

Rejected - Adminbeschwerde | Timo Lachluli | 277528

Sehr geehrtes Grand-RP - Team hiermit bitte ich um eine Neuauswertung der Situation vom 28.01.2026. » Begründung Das Fahrzeug hat uns wiederholt gerammt. Aufgrund der daraus resultierenden Gefährdung haben wir versucht, das Fahrzeug zu stoppen, wie es jeder andere Beamte in einer vergleichbaren...

gta5grand.com

» Proofs

https://imgur.com/js36nuh

- edit message

https://imgur.com/xIYiIod

- new message

https://imgur.com/nujvkP8

- ticket

 

[Lebron Pluxury]

For Fabian or Kathi

 

[Kathi Tired]

After reviewing the evidence available to me, I have come to the conclusion that the administrator issued the sanction correctly.

Reasoning:

Even though GOV vehicles do not have engine blockers, there are alternative ways to stop a vehicle without engaging in excessive car ramming.
You could have called for backup; once you have two vehicles with four officers in total, the person is required to stop once they are boxed in.

Alternatively, you could have requested support from other organizations.

Arnold corrected his statement after realizing that GOV vehicles do not have engine blockers; however, this clarification does not change the final decision. It was merely a correction.

If you are dissatisfied with the current situation regarding engine blockers and anti-radar systems, you are welcome to submit a suggestion on GrandDC.​