- Joined
- Feb 12, 2024
- Messages
- 47
Dear Administration Team,
I am respectfully requesting a full review of the RDM warning issued to me (ID 291115), as I strongly believe this decision does not reflect the actual situation.
I did not commit Random Deathmatch. My actions were not random or without reason.
I was contacted by my friend, who was already involved in an active conflict where several of his family members had been killed. He requested my assistance for protection. I act as his hired bodyguard, and my responsibility is to defend and support him in dangerous situations.
When I arrived at the location, the conflict was already ongoing. The opposing player had previously attacked and killed members of his family. I did not randomly approach someone and open fire without context. I engaged only because it was a continuation of an existing hostile situation.
This was:
• Not a random encounter.
• Not an unprovoked attack.
• Not a separate or unrelated situation.
I acted in direct support of the person who hired me for protection during an active conflict.
If the administration believes this qualifies as RDM, I respectfully request:
1. Clear timestamps showing how my actions were random.
2. Proof that there was no prior conflict.
3. A full re-evaluation of the submitted POV evidence.
I am simply asking for a fair and evidence-based review. If no solid proof of RDM exists, I kindly request that my warning be removed.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
ID 291115
I am respectfully requesting a full review of the RDM warning issued to me (ID 291115), as I strongly believe this decision does not reflect the actual situation.
I did not commit Random Deathmatch. My actions were not random or without reason.
I was contacted by my friend, who was already involved in an active conflict where several of his family members had been killed. He requested my assistance for protection. I act as his hired bodyguard, and my responsibility is to defend and support him in dangerous situations.
When I arrived at the location, the conflict was already ongoing. The opposing player had previously attacked and killed members of his family. I did not randomly approach someone and open fire without context. I engaged only because it was a continuation of an existing hostile situation.
This was:
• Not a random encounter.
• Not an unprovoked attack.
• Not a separate or unrelated situation.
I acted in direct support of the person who hired me for protection during an active conflict.
If the administration believes this qualifies as RDM, I respectfully request:
1. Clear timestamps showing how my actions were random.
2. Proof that there was no prior conflict.
3. A full re-evaluation of the submitted POV evidence.
I am simply asking for a fair and evidence-based review. If no solid proof of RDM exists, I kindly request that my warning be removed.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
ID 291115
