- Joined
- Jan 11, 2026
- Messages
- 120
Dear Administration Team,
I am submitting this appeal regarding the GR 6.15 ( RDM ) warning I received, as I believe the decision was made without reviewing the full context of the situation.
The report filed against me includes only a partial POV that starts at the moment I began shooting. It does not show the events, interaction, or escalation that took place beforehand. By excluding what led up to the engagement, the clip creates the impression that my actions were random, which is not accurate.
RDM implies that there was no valid roleplay reason or prior interaction before the use of force. In this situation, there was context and escalation before shots were fired. The provided POV does not reflect that, and therefore does not present the full picture. Additionally, the clip itself shows that I did not fully kill the player. Simply firing shots during an ongoing interaction does not automatically qualify as RDM, especially when there was prior engagement between both parties.
A fair ruling should be based on the complete timeline of events, not on a shortened clip that only captures the final moments. I believe the warning was issued based on incomplete evidence rather than a full review of the situation. I take the server rules seriously and I am not trying to avoid responsibility; however, I genuinely believe this case was misinterpreted due to missing context.
I respectfully request that this situation be reviewed again with full evidence considered so that a proper and fair conclusion can be reached.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
here is the Forum link :
I am submitting this appeal regarding the GR 6.15 ( RDM ) warning I received, as I believe the decision was made without reviewing the full context of the situation.
The report filed against me includes only a partial POV that starts at the moment I began shooting. It does not show the events, interaction, or escalation that took place beforehand. By excluding what led up to the engagement, the clip creates the impression that my actions were random, which is not accurate.
RDM implies that there was no valid roleplay reason or prior interaction before the use of force. In this situation, there was context and escalation before shots were fired. The provided POV does not reflect that, and therefore does not present the full picture. Additionally, the clip itself shows that I did not fully kill the player. Simply firing shots during an ongoing interaction does not automatically qualify as RDM, especially when there was prior engagement between both parties.
A fair ruling should be based on the complete timeline of events, not on a shortened clip that only captures the final moments. I believe the warning was issued based on incomplete evidence rather than a full review of the situation. I take the server rules seriously and I am not trying to avoid responsibility; however, I genuinely believe this case was misinterpreted due to missing context.
I respectfully request that this situation be reviewed again with full evidence considered so that a proper and fair conclusion can be reached.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
here is the Forum link :
Approved - GR 3.2 | 235043
Dear Administration team, First of all i hope you all are doing well and are in the pink of your health. As you can see in the POV he said me that " I AM YOUR FATHER " and for the confirmation that its a GR 3.2 i asked the admin for that and he said yes so i am opening this report The Gen...
gta5grand.com
