Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Your ID
1615
Players nickname
Strix Slock
Suspect ID
0000
Date of violation
Mar 28, 2026
Time of violation
16:49
Proofs
https://youtu.be/kGavnDQ56D0

Alpha_Vanguard

Player
Player
Joined
Nov 27, 2025
Messages
36
Hey I was involved in the situation and wanted to clarify something regarding GR 6.4 (or however it’s referred to). The suspect was not provided a lawyer because they were already wanted meaning no lawyer is required in that case, even by the arresting officer.
Additionally, the officer did submit a departmental to DOJ . Regarding the alleged insults, when you informed the LSPD Chief of Police that an officer committed a mass rule break, he told you to go and file a case in Capital. After that, you started saying “easy gov, easy gov “
 

Strix Smart

"Music is love"
Player
Joined
Apr 1, 2022
Messages
112
Hey I was involved in the situation and wanted to clarify something regarding GR 6.4 (or however it’s referred to). The suspect was not provided a lawyer because they were already wanted meaning no lawyer is required in that case, even by the arresting officer.
Additionally, the officer did submit a departmental to DOJ . Regarding the alleged insults, when you informed the LSPD Chief of Police that an officer committed a mass rule break, he told you to go and file a case in Capital. After that, you started saying “easy gov, easy gov “
if you would of read my msg above im not talking about the lawyer as you told me to shut up over 15 times what is misconduct GR 6.4
 

Ethan LaQualitequiParle

from Morocco Living In Spain
Leader
Joined
Nov 24, 2025
Messages
27
it is off topic and provking on forums and saying this you say this on forums as a ex leader is wild
My message is not off topic. This thread is about a mass rule break involving LSPD, and my response is directly related to that situation.
I am simply clarifying what happened and explaining my words. There was no intention to provoke anyone only to provide context and address the accusations made against me
Therefore, my reply remains within the topic of the discussion
 

Strix Smart

"Music is love"
Player
Joined
Apr 1, 2022
Messages
112
My message is not off topic. This thread is about a mass rule break involving LSPD, and my response is directly related to that situation.
I am simply clarifying what happened and explaining my words. There was no intention to provoke anyone only to provide context and address the accusations made against me
Therefore, my reply remains within the topic of the discussion
saying shut up icly is misconduct GR 6.4 unless you have a bio
 

Alpha_Vanguard

Player
Player
Joined
Nov 27, 2025
Messages
36
if you would of read my msg above im not talking about the lawyer as you told me to shut up over 15 times what is misconduct GR 6.4
If this situation is being considered under GR 6.4 I would like to clarify something
There are already IC laws that cover this type of behavior such as P.C. 2.9.10 (Provoking) and P.C. 4.4 (Professional Misconduct). These laws exist specifically to handle situations like this within RP
Instead of treating this purely as an OOC rule break the situation could be handled in-character by filing a case hiring a lawyer and proceeding through the proper legal process
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom