- Joined
- Nov 23, 2022
- Messages
- 36
I have been Warned for GR 6.15 by Administrator Cosmic Hayes for RDM | 43381, which I believe is a misunderstanding and the decision was made based on incomplete context.
There are a few important points I would like to clarify:
There was already an attempt to snatch the MPM taking place.
1. The fight had already started in front of the house, as visible in my POV (my POV), because families were attempting to snatch the MPM. Since the situation was already active and the conflict had already begun, I believe it was not necessary to give additional demands to someone who entered the area during the ongoing situation.
2. The player entered the situation from the back of the house during the MPM snatch attempt.
From my perspective, this appeared as a random entry into an already active situation.
3. In the POV provided by the person (His POV) who reported me, it is clearly visible on the minimap that there are his family members present at my house at the same time, and the destination marker is set on the MPM location.
This clearly indicates that he was aware of the situation happening there.
4. Additionally, some of the players who were killed earlier in the situation were also members of his family, which further indicates that he knew what was happening at that location.
5. Even if we assume he was not directly part of the same family group, entering an ongoing MPM snatch situation automatically puts the player into that situation, since from our perspective we cannot identify who belongs to which family in the middle of such an event.
Because of these points, I believe the complaint was presented in a way that misguided the administration, especially considering that the minimap in his POV clearly shows the presence of his family members and the destination set toward the MPM location.
For these reasons, I respectfully request that this situation be reviewed again, as I believe the punishment was issued based on a misunderstanding of the context of the ongoing MPM snatch attempt.
Thank you for your time and consideration.`
There are a few important points I would like to clarify:
There was already an attempt to snatch the MPM taking place.
1. The fight had already started in front of the house, as visible in my POV (my POV), because families were attempting to snatch the MPM. Since the situation was already active and the conflict had already begun, I believe it was not necessary to give additional demands to someone who entered the area during the ongoing situation.
2. The player entered the situation from the back of the house during the MPM snatch attempt.
From my perspective, this appeared as a random entry into an already active situation.
3. In the POV provided by the person (His POV) who reported me, it is clearly visible on the minimap that there are his family members present at my house at the same time, and the destination marker is set on the MPM location.
This clearly indicates that he was aware of the situation happening there.
4. Additionally, some of the players who were killed earlier in the situation were also members of his family, which further indicates that he knew what was happening at that location.
5. Even if we assume he was not directly part of the same family group, entering an ongoing MPM snatch situation automatically puts the player into that situation, since from our perspective we cannot identify who belongs to which family in the middle of such an event.
Because of these points, I believe the complaint was presented in a way that misguided the administration, especially considering that the minimap in his POV clearly shows the presence of his family members and the destination set toward the MPM location.
For these reasons, I respectfully request that this situation be reviewed again, as I believe the punishment was issued based on a misunderstanding of the context of the ongoing MPM snatch attempt.
Thank you for your time and consideration.`
