conflict of intrests for Bio approval !!!

[maziyarbkh]

for the first time I applied for corrupt bio and something makes me confuse!!!
while we can have approval from admins why we should get approval from the leader? why a leader should accept a corruption of his or her ORG?!
and approving or rejecting is only based on the mood of the leader, no clear rules no clear regulation!!

anyone can explain the logic behind this nonsense Idea of leader approval?!

 

[Dingtheas]

for the first time I applied for corrupt bio and something makes me confuse!!!
while we can have approval from admins why we should get approval from the leader? why a leader should accept a corruption of his or her ORG?!
and approving or rejecting is only based on the mood of the leader, no clear rules no clear regulation!!

anyone can explain the logic behind this nonsense Idea of leader approval?!





Also, while waiting for approvals, I’ve been taking breaks by playing on the mostbet bangladesh app — it’s a nice way to unwind, try out some mini-games, or just enjoy some quick entertainment between gaming sessions.

Usually, the idea behind it is that the leader has the ultimate responsibility for their organization, so they get the final say on anything that affects it — including approvals for things like corrupt bio applications. In theory, it’s supposed to prevent misuse or abuse that could harm the ORG.


That said, when there are no rules or standards for approval, it basically becomes a “mood check” for the leader, which is exactly what you’re seeing — it feels unfair and inconsistent. Unfortunately, that’s just how some organizations operate. The only way to reduce the randomness is to have clear documentation or a precedent from other approvals, so you can at least argue your case logically rather than hoping for the leader’s favor.

 

[maziyarbkh]

It's a crazy reasoning! Of course the leader must be in charge and punish for the corruption in their ORGs!
To fight against that they have to teach their HCs to take care of the employees!
If leader is not able to be responsible why he or she reached to that position!!
This conflict of interest is not make sense at all in any logic