- Joined
- Aug 18, 2024
- Messages
- 320
Dear Curator of Project,
I am respectfully requesting a review of my punishment for Leaking Admin Information, as I believe it was issued due to a genuine misunderstanding rather than any malicious intent.
My only intention throughout this situation was to appeal my Turf Blacklist and provide the evidence that I believed was required.
To my knowledge, I had never participated in EN3 gang turfs in a way that would justify such a blacklist, so I created a Turf Blacklist appeal requesting clarification and a review.
My first appeal was reviewed by Bobby Pluxury.
Forum:
Rejected - Turf Blacklist | Frost Vukovic
The reply I received was:
After reading this reply, I understood that my appeal lacked supporting evidence and that I should attach proof directly in the complaint.
The screenshot I attached simply showed that my two account IDs (99944 and 99945) had been added to the Turf Blacklist.
The purpose of attaching it was only to support my appeal because I believed that was exactly what had been requested.
I was not attempting to expose confidential administration information.
I was not attempting to reveal internal procedures.
I was simply trying to prove that my accounts had been blacklisted.
If the screenshot was considered confidential, I genuinely did not know that.
At no point before posting it was I informed that this type of evidence was classified as "Admin Information."
Had I known this, I would never have attached it publicly.
Bobby told me attach proofs and which I later did and then I got banned for attaching the proof.
Instead of receiving a review of my Turf Blacklist, my punishment was changed to Leaking Admin Information, and my Curator of Project appeal was rejected with the following response:
followed by
As a result, my appeal regarding the Turf Blacklist was never actually reviewed on its merits.
I respectfully ask the administration to consider my intention rather than only the outcome.
My intention was:
There was also a previous punishment involving "Leaking Admin Information" related to the in-game phone system.
That punishment was investigated through a PC Check conducted by Floki, where it was determined that the situation resulted from a bug rather than intentional misconduct.
The punishment was subsequently lifted.
Forum: Reviewed - Blacklisted | Fabio Pluxury by Carlos
I mention this only to demonstrate that I have previously cooperated fully with administration and that, when misunderstandings have occurred, I have always accepted investigations and complied with the staff.
First Appeal:
Rejected - Turf Blacklist | Frost Vukovic
Second Appeal:
Rejected - Turf Blacklist | Frost Vukovic
Reviewed - Blacklisted | Fabio Pluxury by Carlos
I fully understand that administration must protect confidential information.
If posting the screenshot violated server policy, I sincerely apologize.
However, I respectfully ask that my actions be viewed in their proper context
If the information I provided is Admin Info then how can a Gang Leader or Deputy of a Gang can access it.
I attached the screenshot only because I believed I was following the reviewing administrator's instruction to provide proof for my complaint.
There was no malicious intent, no attempt to expose internal administration information, and no intention to violate server rules.
For that reason, I kindly request that my punishment for Leaking Admin Information be reconsidered and removed.
Thank you for taking the time to review my appeal.
I am respectfully requesting a review of my punishment for Leaking Admin Information, as I believe it was issued due to a genuine misunderstanding rather than any malicious intent.
My only intention throughout this situation was to appeal my Turf Blacklist and provide the evidence that I believed was required.
Background of the situation:
I discovered that both my EN3 accounts (IDs 99944 and 99945) had been added to the Turf Blacklist.To my knowledge, I had never participated in EN3 gang turfs in a way that would justify such a blacklist, so I created a Turf Blacklist appeal requesting clarification and a review.
My first appeal was reviewed by Bobby Pluxury.
Forum:
Rejected - Turf Blacklist | Frost Vukovic
The reply I received was:
After reading this reply, I understood that my appeal lacked supporting evidence and that I should attach proof directly in the complaint.
Why I Attached the Screenshot in the Forum:
The screenshot I attached simply showed that my two account IDs (99944 and 99945) had been added to the Turf Blacklist.
The purpose of attaching it was only to support my appeal because I believed that was exactly what had been requested.
I was not attempting to expose confidential administration information.
I was not attempting to reveal internal procedures.
I was simply trying to prove that my accounts had been blacklisted.
If the screenshot was considered confidential, I genuinely did not know that.
At no point before posting it was I informed that this type of evidence was classified as "Admin Information."
Had I known this, I would never have attached it publicly.
Bobby told me attach proofs and which I later did and then I got banned for attaching the proof.
What Happened Afterwards (I got blacklisted) :
Instead of receiving a review of my Turf Blacklist, my punishment was changed to Leaking Admin Information, and my Curator of Project appeal was rejected with the following response:
followed by
As a result, my appeal regarding the Turf Blacklist was never actually reviewed on its merits.
My Intention was:
I respectfully ask the administration to consider my intention rather than only the outcome.
My intention was:
- to appeal my Turf Blacklist,
- to provide the proof that I believed had been requested,
- to help the reviewing administrator understand my appeal.
Previous Similar Situation
There was also a previous punishment involving "Leaking Admin Information" related to the in-game phone system.
That punishment was investigated through a PC Check conducted by Floki, where it was determined that the situation resulted from a bug rather than intentional misconduct.
The punishment was subsequently lifted.
Forum: Reviewed - Blacklisted | Fabio Pluxury by Carlos
I mention this only to demonstrate that I have previously cooperated fully with administration and that, when misunderstandings have occurred, I have always accepted investigations and complied with the staff.
Related Threads (I appealed for my GR1.3 unban for my Twink account but later I was Banned for Leaking Admin Information)
Forum: Rejected - Ban for GR1.3 | Frost VukovicTurf Blacklist
First Appeal:
Rejected - Turf Blacklist | Frost Vukovic
Second Appeal:
Rejected - Turf Blacklist | Frost Vukovic
Previous Leaking Admin Information Case
Reviewed - Blacklisted | Fabio Pluxury by Carlos
Final Request
I fully understand that administration must protect confidential information.
If posting the screenshot violated server policy, I sincerely apologize.
However, I respectfully ask that my actions be viewed in their proper context
If the information I provided is Admin Info then how can a Gang Leader or Deputy of a Gang can access it.
I attached the screenshot only because I believed I was following the reviewing administrator's instruction to provide proof for my complaint.
There was no malicious intent, no attempt to expose internal administration information, and no intention to violate server rules.
For that reason, I kindly request that my punishment for Leaking Admin Information be reconsidered and removed.
Thank you for taking the time to review my appeal.
