Reviewed Demorgan for PG | Ranveer Malhotra

[Hank Palmer]

So few days ago I filed a complaint against a player for gen 6.2 which you can read here Approved - Gen 6.2 (entering interior and leaving the game to evade RP) | 22053.

Based on the initial POV alone that I submitted, I believe it's enough to proof my complaint (please tell me the reason if you think otherwise). I asked for his passport and he decided to enter interior and left the game. Whether or not I have reasonable suspicion to ask for his passport, that's IC and he can't just escaped like that.

But instead of approving or rejecting my thread due to lack of proof, it took so much time for Ranveer to review it. After that long time, he ordered me to provide my POV from the start of shift (with deadline) as he suspected me to have done PG. I just knew that player is only obliged to provide POV if the case is an event/arrest (supported by Rejected - POV REQUEST | 10411). He even posted the POV demand in FIB email. I believe this was unprofessional, that he forced me to provide POV that's actually not obliged to prove my own innocence (violates the presumption of innocence as well). I submitted it because I'm afraid to get punishment for failing to provide POV.

I'm fine getting the punishment if it's shown in the initial evidence that I submitted, or complained by other player, but not with the POV that he coerced me to submit.

One last thing, can you please point out when did I PG? Just to make sure it won't happen again in the future.

 

[Hank Palmer]

With all due respect, if you are going to reject this thread, at least tell me why my initial proof is not enough, and/or the OOC rule that obliged me to provide POV whenever an admin demands it in any situation. Because if my initial proof is enough, then there's no reason for him to demand for another. If it's not, then he should've just reject the thread.

 

[Alex Odd]

complain have no sense as u have not provided initial post