My post was rejected about my car being stolen from a GZ. I just would like to ask why it was denied for insufficient evidence when it is clear from the time stamps and the condition of my vehicle on both my body cam, as well as the screen shot the suspect had given prove otherwise. This guy has been reported for stealing from GZs multiple times, and all that is happening is rejected forum posts. He has gone into SAHP parking garage and took vehicles and rammed through fences just to steal a car an expensive car. I just think its something that needs to be addressed because it is not cheap to get a vehicle back.
In the 1st clip, it shows the time of when my car was parked there and that it was in perfect condition. In the evidence of the suspect, my car looks damaged (rammed) and the time stamp lines up to prove that he had a whole hour to ram my car into that position. It is clear that he rammed my vehicle out of the area just to take a phone camera photo of the car because he knew he would get put on forums for this. It is very self explanatory evidence and I do not see why it is considered insufficient. If you'd like, I have full 1 hour body cam of me parking the vehicle and then coming back to it being gone and stolen(notified by notification). This guy can't keep getting away with this.
In the 1st clip, it shows the time of when my car was parked there and that it was in perfect condition. In the evidence of the suspect, my car looks damaged (rammed) and the time stamp lines up to prove that he had a whole hour to ram my car into that position. It is clear that he rammed my vehicle out of the area just to take a phone camera photo of the car because he knew he would get put on forums for this. It is very self explanatory evidence and I do not see why it is considered insufficient. If you'd like, I have full 1 hour body cam of me parking the vehicle and then coming back to it being gone and stolen(notified by notification). This guy can't keep getting away with this.