- Joined
- May 25, 2021
- Messages
- 1,669
So Xavier said that I should have used a taser first but isn't that an ic issue isn't it. In the law of Code_of_Civil_and_Procedural_Law, it says this,
"3.3 The Principle of Necessity.
3.3.1 In case of procedural coercion of a person, law enforcement and other authorized bodies are obliged to adhere to the principles of the adequate use of force in relation to the actions of the citizen to whom they are applied and to only use as much force as necessary, given the circumstances.
3.3.2 The stages of the use of force against a person are as follows:
a) The Presence of a Law Enforcement Officer. This applies if there is no need to use a higher stage of the use of force.
b) Verbal Commands or Caution. Applies if it is necessary to suppress a violation of the law.
c) Simple Forceful Action - used if it is necessary to arrest a citizen (wringing hands, pressing on pain points and the usual use of handcuffs);
d) Severe forceful impact - used in the event of a threat of causing minor bodily harm to state citizens or causing damage to property (punches, kicks, batons, the use of electric shock devices);
e) Lethal force - used in the event of a threat to the life of state citizens, or if the suspect is trying to escape from the crime scene, to prevent a direct threat to the life of a person or employee. At least one clear verbal warning must be given before lethal force is used on a fleeing subject. "
When ID 2015 was punching id 42498, I thought that his life could have been in danger because he looked like he may have been punched a couple of times. So I did what anyone would have done and shot him If you were getting punched in real life as an officer and your friend was there you wouldn't shoot the guy who was hurting your friend if you did have a clear shot. So I still don't understand how it was non-RP, if I had an RP reason for everything, When I did shoot him, it was breaking the law but how is that non-RP if I was able to get a clear shot? I thank you for taking the time out of your day to review this.
"3.3 The Principle of Necessity.
3.3.1 In case of procedural coercion of a person, law enforcement and other authorized bodies are obliged to adhere to the principles of the adequate use of force in relation to the actions of the citizen to whom they are applied and to only use as much force as necessary, given the circumstances.
3.3.2 The stages of the use of force against a person are as follows:
a) The Presence of a Law Enforcement Officer. This applies if there is no need to use a higher stage of the use of force.
b) Verbal Commands or Caution. Applies if it is necessary to suppress a violation of the law.
c) Simple Forceful Action - used if it is necessary to arrest a citizen (wringing hands, pressing on pain points and the usual use of handcuffs);
d) Severe forceful impact - used in the event of a threat of causing minor bodily harm to state citizens or causing damage to property (punches, kicks, batons, the use of electric shock devices);
e) Lethal force - used in the event of a threat to the life of state citizens, or if the suspect is trying to escape from the crime scene, to prevent a direct threat to the life of a person or employee. At least one clear verbal warning must be given before lethal force is used on a fleeing subject. "
When ID 2015 was punching id 42498, I thought that his life could have been in danger because he looked like he may have been punched a couple of times. So I did what anyone would have done and shot him If you were getting punched in real life as an officer and your friend was there you wouldn't shoot the guy who was hurting your friend if you did have a clear shot. So I still don't understand how it was non-RP, if I had an RP reason for everything, When I did shoot him, it was breaking the law but how is that non-RP if I was able to get a clear shot? I thank you for taking the time out of your day to review this.
