Rejected Wrong Decision | Xavier Escuela

[Jackson Eclipse]

So Xavier said this "Its not ID 40851's fault that he uncuffed the person who had gun in his hand, and also note that I KNOW thats its not a glitch, But I wont be warning FIB based on "assumption" that some random single fib agent cuffed a guy WITHOUT any proof" How is it not his fault if the end of the day the guy still had a gun in his hand when he was uncuffed. He said this " But I wont be warning FIB based on "assumption" that some random single fib agent cuffed a guy WITHOUT any proof" but the guy who uncuffed him was a deputy and still is at the time. At the end of the day even if it is not his fault it is still pg as IRL you cannot do that. As PG is defined by "owergaming can be defined as performing acts that are not humanlike; forcing roleplay on others without giving them a fair chance; making up things which did not happen so that you can benefit; roleplaying things which are not possible script-wise so that you can gain an unfair advantage. Roleplaying unrealistic things that wouldnt happen in the real world and not allowing others to react to your roleplay." The thing that 40851 did was not human like at all and wouldn't be possible at all irl. Also, I am making this forum as Lebron said to if I do not agree with Xavier Decision. In all I am not trying to spam also have a great day.

 

[Jackson Eclipse]

Futher more Xavier also stated this "There is NO fault of ID 40851, I dont know how its PG, if you uncuff a person with no guns in your hand" if you unruffled someone while they had a gun in there hand it is no human like at all.

 

[Jackson Eclipse]

Uncuffed not unruffled sorry, autocorrect

 

[Sam Pluxury]

Rejected,
it should be punishment for the person who cuffed him in the first place but i don't see in your pov who cuffed him so admin made correct decision​