- Joined
- Dec 1, 2022
- Messages
- 1,644
Hello Bobby,
I've been playing GRP since almost 1.7 years ago, and I have never seen such corruption in front of my eyes.
Since I was added to the election group, Elon has always targeted me, and he is a very biassed admin; he is a double-faced admin.
He said to me, "Lavi, especially you; if you fuck up, Simon will get leadership. Don't fuck up; don't get punished".
OMG WTF, check my punishment history, and check Elon's punishment history on en3 (admin + twink) and see who has more punishments.
Why me? Why would I break the rule? Why can't Simon, especially, break the rule? Why is it so?
PROOFS-
Also, not only this, after the interview he told me very specifically Lavi don't break rules.
Elon does not respect the server players, if he would than he would ofc talk to me with respect.
He made a lot of pointy and offensive lines to me.
PROOFS-
Elon is bringing our personal beef to his professional work. People believe that admins work hard for them to provide a good RP experience.
Let them be proved wrong with the proofs provided by Mr. Elon.
Now, let's come to Ms. Sophia.
After the interview, every applicant, regardless of whether he or she failed or passed the interview, HAS THE RIGHT TO KNOW HIS MISTAKES.
I made 0 mistakes—hardly 1—and that's it. There was no nonsense in the interview; it was straight-forward.
After the interview was over, me and Simon were dragged, and we were told that elections would happen. I asked her, "May I know my mistakes?
Ms. Sophia replied, "Do you want to know the mistakes in private, or do you both want your mistakes to be told in front of both of you?
I said, "Tell me here. She said, I didn't count it. WTF really?
First of all, Sophia if you are checking this forum (ofc). Tell me how many mistakes I did in the interview and how many Simon did IN THE PUBLIC. Proofs should be sent to higher admins as well.
Now, lets come to another point.
ELECTION RULE 3
When I posted my application, Kim and Mark joined me. I'll show the proofs if I forced them or if they joined my party by their own choice or now.
So, Simon technically had 18 after two were gone. I told Sophia. Ms. Sophia said, "SO???? It's up to the curators."
If it was up to the curators, then why were the rules made?
PROOFS
Dear Bobby, I have never seen this much corruption.
You make the best decisions for your loyal players, and that's why players like me would still pay EN3 no matter what. Please do me justice.
Thank you so much.
I've been playing GRP since almost 1.7 years ago, and I have never seen such corruption in front of my eyes.
Since I was added to the election group, Elon has always targeted me, and he is a very biassed admin; he is a double-faced admin.
He said to me, "Lavi, especially you; if you fuck up, Simon will get leadership. Don't fuck up; don't get punished".
OMG WTF, check my punishment history, and check Elon's punishment history on en3 (admin + twink) and see who has more punishments.
Why me? Why would I break the rule? Why can't Simon, especially, break the rule? Why is it so?
PROOFS-
Also, not only this, after the interview he told me very specifically Lavi don't break rules.
Elon does not respect the server players, if he would than he would ofc talk to me with respect.
He made a lot of pointy and offensive lines to me.
PROOFS-
Elon is bringing our personal beef to his professional work. People believe that admins work hard for them to provide a good RP experience.
Let them be proved wrong with the proofs provided by Mr. Elon.
Now, let's come to Ms. Sophia.
After the interview, every applicant, regardless of whether he or she failed or passed the interview, HAS THE RIGHT TO KNOW HIS MISTAKES.
I made 0 mistakes—hardly 1—and that's it. There was no nonsense in the interview; it was straight-forward.
After the interview was over, me and Simon were dragged, and we were told that elections would happen. I asked her, "May I know my mistakes?
Ms. Sophia replied, "Do you want to know the mistakes in private, or do you both want your mistakes to be told in front of both of you?
I said, "Tell me here. She said, I didn't count it. WTF really?
First of all, Sophia if you are checking this forum (ofc). Tell me how many mistakes I did in the interview and how many Simon did IN THE PUBLIC. Proofs should be sent to higher admins as well.
Now, lets come to another point.
ELECTION RULE 3
`3) The party has to contain minimum of 20 members and has to be unique.`
When I posted my application, Kim and Mark joined me. I'll show the proofs if I forced them or if they joined my party by their own choice or now.
So, Simon technically had 18 after two were gone. I told Sophia. Ms. Sophia said, "SO???? It's up to the curators."
If it was up to the curators, then why were the rules made?
PROOFS
Dear Bobby, I have never seen this much corruption.
You make the best decisions for your loyal players, and that's why players like me would still pay EN3 no matter what. Please do me justice.
Thank you so much.