Rejected Possible Bias | Naveed Stark

[John Morozov]

Hello, I would like to start off that I am not claiming that the administrator is 100% biased, or anything like this. However, the situation that happened in my eyes looks like an admin bias.

Shortly about what happened: Bloods took hostages on top of Bloods parking, I came to negotiate and paid the money to release them. After I paid the money, Bloods instantly started running toward LEOs, pointing guns and trying to take more hostages. From all the information that I have this is not allowed and falls under Fail RP, as if we complied with gang members and fulfilled their demands they HAVE to let us go without shooting at us or blocking our way. However, Bloods started running and trying to take other LEOs hostage 1 second after the exchange happened. You can hear in the POV members of Bloods saying "put your hands up" literally 1 second after we started walking toward our cars.

I even sent the POV to one of my curators to check with them, and they confirmed that it was Fail RP and UB Demands. The question is, why didn't Bloods curator review the rules broken by Bloods, and without locking the thread for my curators, issued a warning to a leader?

I would like the thread to be re-opened and reviewed by one of the FIB curators as it is against the leader, as well as the whole situation to be reviewed on a higher level regarding possible bias from Bloods curator Naveed Stark and possible targeting of FIB.

Thank you for reading this complaint, I hope that the truth will be unveiled.

Proofs below:
Complaint against me by one of the bloods members (I think deputy) - On consideration - Fear RP | 29012
Longer POV of the situation where Bloods rulebreaks can be seen even better -

Administrator Naveed Stark reviewed the complaint made by one of the Bloods deputies instead of reviewing them in order -

https://imgur.com/a/0HCWaoz

 

[Bobby Pluxury]

Locked for curator of admins.

 

[Adham Pluxury]

Rejected

On the first proofs you sent, the complaint is currently being considered, and when admins want more proofs, they will ask for it or they can talk to other admins about it. I cannot see any issue here as the complaint is still on consideration. Once the verdict is taken and you disagree with it, feel free to make a complaint and explain your intention.

On the second proof that you provided, how would admin could be biassed if they did not review the complaints in order? I cannot see any issue with that either.​