Rejected State Rule 5.10 | 115673

[Sylva Plumberg]

On my footage it's clearly visible that an LSPD officer on duty, in duty outfit took a ride in a civilian car.


(Really sorry for the background noise, kids were having fun.)

 

[Yaswanth Trigger]

On Consideration

 

[Yaswanth Trigger]

LOCKED FOR LSPD CURATORS​

 

[Masta Killa]

on consideration​

 

[Masta Killa]

requesting ID 108332 provide POV of employee using personal car to respond to a call
requesting ID 115673 provide POV of the situation + explanation
​

 

[Sylva Plumberg]

In my other 3 LSPD terms we got verbals for the exact same situations. If there is no punishment, than it's a very bad example for the future LEO's.

Im curious what will be the decision after 115673's POV.

 

[Chad TopG]

In my other 3 LSPD terms we got verbals for the exact same situations. If there is no punishment, than it's a very bad example for the future LEO's.

Im curious what will be the decision after 115673's POV.

i had a code A and then that guy gave me ride from the highway brother its not my vehicle he gave me ride from highway there was power outage in my area so i had a code a and that civilian just helped to get to the HQ

 

[Masta Killa]

thread rejected
ID 108332 failed to provide evidence of a rule break
State 5.10 official transport required for calls, nothing about getting a ride from a civilian in his case after his game crashed
​