- Joined
- Aug 14, 2021
- Messages
- 103
(Punishment type only put to open forum. No actual punishment received)
https://gta5grand.com/forum/threads/516979/
Rule of State 1.8: Can this resolution be checked by a Senior Curator as I do not think the issue of Rule of State 1.8 was adequately addressed as the Executive Order is by the IC laws (Lawyers Code) illegal and only the issue of whether the document was signed or not was addressed by Nik Payne.
PG: Also the matter of PG was not addressed and much of this applies as per the definition: Powergaming (PG) - Powergaming can be defined as performing acts that are not humanlike; forcing roleplay on others without giving them a fair chance (takes away our lawyers licenses so we cannot appeal the matter in court); making up things which did not happen so that you can benefit; roleplaying things which are not possible script-wise so that you can gain an unfair advantage. Roleplaying unrealistic things that wouldnt happen in the real world and not allowing others to react to your roleplay (No Governor would in the real world revoke all Lawyers Licenses in his state and no Governor ever has that authority)
My main question is that are Admins or Curators permitted to determine what is valid by the Laws of the City? The Laws are IC and I would think that Curators determining what is and is not permitted by the Law and then informing the Governor and the Attorney General to act on this is interfering in RP. It does not in this sort of situation allow any form of Court Session, Appeal or Argument as to the IC legality. It becomes an situation of "Curator said so" which is a dangerous and unfair situation when applied to something like this and is simply a way of allowing PG by the above definition.
This has been a longstanding issue in our City where advice from an Admin is not correct by the IC laws of the city and has not been properly addressed in the past where Curators bypass the IC laws or Admins provide incorrect advice regarding the law. Past examples include:
When a state employee may or should show their ID (Still an ongoing problem)
When a suspect is issued fines more than 50,000. This was a problem a few months back due to FIB being misinformed by a State Curator and the DOJ having to issue refunds as documented on the DOJ financial logs on GOV email.
Note: The current Attorney General Nezar Wolffy clearly stated in the Forum Post that the Executive Order was signed IC, which as per the closing report by Nik Payne was clearly untrue. Is this not deceiving Admins or lying on the Forum?
Note: This order was republished this morning on the GOV email public announcements in a different form and is still IC illegal but was likely given approval by a Curator so we are back to square one in this fight for our rights as Lawyers.
On a final note I am not fighting this because I am not AG anymore, I am fighting the utter injustice of what is happening to the Lawyers in the City and the destruction of all that me and many others have worked so hard to build over a long period of time.
https://gta5grand.com/forum/threads/516979/
Rule of State 1.8: Can this resolution be checked by a Senior Curator as I do not think the issue of Rule of State 1.8 was adequately addressed as the Executive Order is by the IC laws (Lawyers Code) illegal and only the issue of whether the document was signed or not was addressed by Nik Payne.
PG: Also the matter of PG was not addressed and much of this applies as per the definition: Powergaming (PG) - Powergaming can be defined as performing acts that are not humanlike; forcing roleplay on others without giving them a fair chance (takes away our lawyers licenses so we cannot appeal the matter in court); making up things which did not happen so that you can benefit; roleplaying things which are not possible script-wise so that you can gain an unfair advantage. Roleplaying unrealistic things that wouldnt happen in the real world and not allowing others to react to your roleplay (No Governor would in the real world revoke all Lawyers Licenses in his state and no Governor ever has that authority)
My main question is that are Admins or Curators permitted to determine what is valid by the Laws of the City? The Laws are IC and I would think that Curators determining what is and is not permitted by the Law and then informing the Governor and the Attorney General to act on this is interfering in RP. It does not in this sort of situation allow any form of Court Session, Appeal or Argument as to the IC legality. It becomes an situation of "Curator said so" which is a dangerous and unfair situation when applied to something like this and is simply a way of allowing PG by the above definition.
This has been a longstanding issue in our City where advice from an Admin is not correct by the IC laws of the city and has not been properly addressed in the past where Curators bypass the IC laws or Admins provide incorrect advice regarding the law. Past examples include:
When a state employee may or should show their ID (Still an ongoing problem)
When a suspect is issued fines more than 50,000. This was a problem a few months back due to FIB being misinformed by a State Curator and the DOJ having to issue refunds as documented on the DOJ financial logs on GOV email.
Note: The current Attorney General Nezar Wolffy clearly stated in the Forum Post that the Executive Order was signed IC, which as per the closing report by Nik Payne was clearly untrue. Is this not deceiving Admins or lying on the Forum?
Note: This order was republished this morning on the GOV email public announcements in a different form and is still IC illegal but was likely given approval by a Curator so we are back to square one in this fight for our rights as Lawyers.
On a final note I am not fighting this because I am not AG anymore, I am fighting the utter injustice of what is happening to the Lawyers in the City and the destruction of all that me and many others have worked so hard to build over a long period of time.
