Reviewed Biased Admin | Hasbelkader Mithat

[Yuvraj Federal]

Hello Lebron/Sam: We(Ballas) Got Verbal For Ghetto Rule 2.13 Here
Proof:

https://imgur.com/a/v8MqzBQ

Proof:

https://imgur.com/WkxdKVU

In this screenshot u can see time of post which is 22:23 and attack time is 22:53 acc to our timezone

Proof:

https://imgur.com/acDKkvQ

we kicked them all from turf discord 20 mins before attack so they got angry and tried to sabotage

Proof:

https://imgur.com/vhlmwQS

This is the roster we made which doesnt include the two guys who sabotaged that is mizo and thampa

This is the team we played with which didnt include them as well:
Proof: Watch Desktop 25-02-2024 22-56-06 | Streamable

This is proof of bug for us they werent in gang but they were and trying to sabotage org
Proof: Watch Desktop 25-02-2024 23-04-37 | Streamable

all this was shown to mithat the moment this started and even though he knew its clear sabotage he didnt punish them , punished us and didnt even wait for 24 hrs to again provide all these evidence when he knew that we have the evidence now there are pov req and punishment due for bloods since 4 days but he isnt concluding and punishing them but he is concludin pov req made on us the moment its made so that we get warns and disband and all pov req we made on bloods isnt valid anymore

every single proof was there for sabotage was there note : those turfers joined from bloods , messed up in ballas then bloods made many pov req and then they offered us to close pov req and they will close and tried to fix turfs
Proof:

https://imgur.com/TwO4onK

Proof: imgur.com

the moment we said no to offer we got verbal.

 

[Sam Pluxury]

Has this situation been resolved by senior crime curator within the capture refutation channel?​

 

[Sam Pluxury]

Any situation related to capture, you need to first refute against the punishment in the "capture refutation" channel further if you do not agree with the senior's conclusion then you can proceed to make an admin complaint based on that decision.​