- Joined
- Feb 22, 2024
- Messages
- 201
Dead Bob Dear admins,
I hope this message finds you well.
I am writing to address a decision that I believe to be incorrect. In thread number 683270, ID 373067 was punished for PG, and I would like to explain why I disagree with this decision, ID 373067, along with myself and a few members of our group, were actively scouting around a house, both inside and out, in search of potential raiders during the time when Solar's Takeaway was imminent. During this time, ID 363733 arrived on the scene. We proceeded to issue demands for him to leave the area, with ID 373067 participating in this process. Despite our requests, ID 363733 refused to comply and starts mixing (pov ). Given our assessment that he was not leaving and might potentially call for reinforcements, we felt it necessary to maintain a presence both inside and outside the house as a precautionary measure. Throughout this ordeal, ID 373067 was consistently present at the scene, making it unclear to me how this could be considered PG
Furthermore, ID 363733 did not receive punishment for RDM. In the altercation, he initiated gunfire without issuing any demands prior to Solar's raid, acting in concert with his associates Additionally, he was not penalized for GR 6.8.
I respectfully request a review of these points and a reconsideration of the decision regarding ID 373067's punishment.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
I hope this message finds you well.
I am writing to address a decision that I believe to be incorrect. In thread number 683270, ID 373067 was punished for PG, and I would like to explain why I disagree with this decision, ID 373067, along with myself and a few members of our group, were actively scouting around a house, both inside and out, in search of potential raiders during the time when Solar's Takeaway was imminent. During this time, ID 363733 arrived on the scene. We proceeded to issue demands for him to leave the area, with ID 373067 participating in this process. Despite our requests, ID 363733 refused to comply and starts mixing (pov ). Given our assessment that he was not leaving and might potentially call for reinforcements, we felt it necessary to maintain a presence both inside and outside the house as a precautionary measure. Throughout this ordeal, ID 373067 was consistently present at the scene, making it unclear to me how this could be considered PG
Furthermore, ID 363733 did not receive punishment for RDM. In the altercation, he initiated gunfire without issuing any demands prior to Solar's raid, acting in concert with his associates Additionally, he was not penalized for GR 6.8.
I respectfully request a review of these points and a reconsideration of the decision regarding ID 373067's punishment.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.