About this 3rd video, 0:08 I gave her a verbal warning
After that I have taken out my gun,
according to Article 3 of Code of Civil and Procedural (Legislation) - 3.3 Principal of Necessity - The way she was running (zig zag running) it was almost impossible for us to taze her + All the other agents present there was newly recruit and they don't have access to warehouse to take guns, they are only allowed to carry a stun gun with them.
And
According to Code of Firearms Article 5.6g, we can use lethal force if a person is trying to evade the arrest.
+ 0:08 to 0:25 she was running around the capital, it was literally annoying for a person who works at that place in a legal manner. There was no IC reason for her to do so, consider it as Provoking again. You can also see the time difference between first two videos and this video. After leaving at 10:36 (IC time), she came back again at 11:01 (IC time) i.e. after 25 min she came back again to provoke the government agents, which proves it was a intentional provoking.
0:29 I didnt fired a single bullet as there were many people around, 0:29 i gave her warning to stop with a lethal force in hand, 0:31, I fired a single bullet on her, which was warning fire, even though she didnt stop - Fear RP
watch from 1:48 to 1:53, her words were "I need backup everyone, come and f*** this guy " - GR 6.19
