- Joined
- May 30, 2021
- Messages
- 155
I'm here making this complaint to expose the blatant biasness by these two admins. On March 30th I was prisoned and warned by Darren Miller for 6.21 It is forbidden to abuse armored cars(impossible to shoot players inside). I tried to explain to Darren that the vehicle which I used, called the Enus Jubilee is actually not an armored car which is impossible to shoot into, the vehicles windows break after a few shots which would then mean that the vehicle is therefore not impossible to shoot into. Darren refused to listen to me or even acknowledge the fact. This is the complaint. Rejected - Warning - Darren Miller
The same day I appealed the warning and prison for rule 6.21. I then tried to re-explain that the vehicles windows break and that would then deem the car not impossible to shoot into. Again Darren refused to listen to anything I told him and went off topic about the whole situation explaining Powergame. The complaint was then closed by Alex Odd who also refused to listen to anything I had to say and said that the car is armored and I was abusing it, resulting in the closing of my appeal. This is the complaint. Rejected - Warning - Darren Miller
On April 7th a friend of mine posted a complaint against someone for using the same vehicle in the ghetto and the complaint was closed by Vick Klaus. He said that he had tested the vehicle in-game and had deemed it not impossible to shoot inside of it. Here is that complaint. Rejected - Powergaming | 104900
The same night my friend made a appeal about the complaint being rejected because they knew I had been prisoned and warned for using the same vehicle, the Enus Jubilee. The appeal was then closed because both Vick Klaus and Alex Odd explained to her that the vehicle was not impossible to shoot into and that the car was then considered to not be armored.
This is Vick Klaus and Alex Odds exact words in that complaint.
They both go on to say the same exact things I tried to explain to Alex Odd and Darren a week prior and closed the appeal.
Here is the link to that appeal. Rejected - Unfair Punishment | Darren Miller or Vick Klaus
This whole situation is completely bias. You have Alex Odd telling me the car is armored in one complaint then a week later he says that the car isn't armored. I get prisoned and warned by the other guy doesn't. What's fair about this? Are they purposely doing it towards me? Is it because they made a mistake? I really don't know the answer at this point. I tried to speak to Alex Odd directly in game and Darren but they both close my reports and then other admins tell me I'm spamming the reports. Which isn't the case. They just refuse to want to speak to me because they know how blatant their being bias. Something needs to be done. I've been ignored for a week and my complaints get closed with bias responses.
Alex Odd is to high of a admin for this stuff to be happening and Darren abuses his powers regularly when he doesn't like someone. So which one is it? Are you allowed to use the car or not?
If you don't want people to use the vehicles that you added into the game then maybe rewrite the rule? Because it doesn't make any sense. You should add and vehicles with breakable windows aren't allowed as well. Not "impossible" to shoot into. When people read that what do you think they're going to think?
I want my warning removed and this bias behavior put to a end. Thanks.
The same day I appealed the warning and prison for rule 6.21. I then tried to re-explain that the vehicles windows break and that would then deem the car not impossible to shoot into. Again Darren refused to listen to anything I told him and went off topic about the whole situation explaining Powergame. The complaint was then closed by Alex Odd who also refused to listen to anything I had to say and said that the car is armored and I was abusing it, resulting in the closing of my appeal. This is the complaint. Rejected - Warning - Darren Miller
On April 7th a friend of mine posted a complaint against someone for using the same vehicle in the ghetto and the complaint was closed by Vick Klaus. He said that he had tested the vehicle in-game and had deemed it not impossible to shoot inside of it. Here is that complaint. Rejected - Powergaming | 104900
The same night my friend made a appeal about the complaint being rejected because they knew I had been prisoned and warned for using the same vehicle, the Enus Jubilee. The appeal was then closed because both Vick Klaus and Alex Odd explained to her that the vehicle was not impossible to shoot into and that the car was then considered to not be armored.
This is Vick Klaus and Alex Odds exact words in that complaint.
They both go on to say the same exact things I tried to explain to Alex Odd and Darren a week prior and closed the appeal.
Here is the link to that appeal. Rejected - Unfair Punishment | Darren Miller or Vick Klaus
This whole situation is completely bias. You have Alex Odd telling me the car is armored in one complaint then a week later he says that the car isn't armored. I get prisoned and warned by the other guy doesn't. What's fair about this? Are they purposely doing it towards me? Is it because they made a mistake? I really don't know the answer at this point. I tried to speak to Alex Odd directly in game and Darren but they both close my reports and then other admins tell me I'm spamming the reports. Which isn't the case. They just refuse to want to speak to me because they know how blatant their being bias. Something needs to be done. I've been ignored for a week and my complaints get closed with bias responses.
Alex Odd is to high of a admin for this stuff to be happening and Darren abuses his powers regularly when he doesn't like someone. So which one is it? Are you allowed to use the car or not?
If you don't want people to use the vehicles that you added into the game then maybe rewrite the rule? Because it doesn't make any sense. You should add and vehicles with breakable windows aren't allowed as well. Not "impossible" to shoot into. When people read that what do you think they're going to think?
I want my warning removed and this bias behavior put to a end. Thanks.
