Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
  • PLEASE PAY ATTTENTION

    Before making complaint with a prefix for curator of the project please read these rules.
    1. Make complaint only in case if you already posted for high admins and they did not help you.
    2. Complaints for curator of the project ONLY for management level complaints. You can't appeal your warning or 7 days ban. You can appeal only permanent or long-term bans.

    Thank you for attention! (c) Mazhor Pluxury
Status
Not open for further replies.
Your ID
16473
Players nickname
Kazuto Kirigaya
Administrators nickname
Del Federal
Date
Oct 16, 2024
Time
16:07
Proofs
https://imgur.com/a/9pieh5Z

Kazuto Kirigaya

LI
Player
Joined
Mar 18, 2022
Messages
574
Hello Chiefs,

So earlier today Del Federal had given LifeInvader a warn and a verbal staying that we were not complying to their demand as well as we were inactive.

I feel like the decision the administrator took is totally wrong since we have always complied to what the curators have told us to and have taken immediate active regarding what is being told for us to do so and regarding inactivity i wouldn't disagree with it but also wont say i agree with this decision as well since we are taking every possible measure to to increase activity and the ORG does have activity at all the time. If the decision curator took was based on if the ORG had 0 activity at all time then i would understand, But this is something that barely happens even if it did happen it happens like for 5 minutes or so every now and then.

I feel this inactivity decision was taken due to some people complaining that their ADs are not being posted (Due to our ADs team are working on posting ever AD they possibly can post and sometimes some ADs get slipped) even though the rate of ADs flowing are always fine and just not sometimes. The amount of ADs we get every minute is more than the ORG can handle. Even if if he 20 editors editing ADs and posting them at the same time then due to the amount of players on the server we would get the same number of ADs back in the PDA within seconds so PDA mostly full and is flowing properly for around 90% of the time.

Please do ask other 2 curators as well regarding both the reason the ORG was punished for and also do check curator chat to see if we neglected anything the curator told us to do so.

Another reason as to why the curator gave the punishment could be due to him having personal grudges with me because i had asked him in curator chat to engage with the ORG a bit and see the situation for him self since I barely see him online and the other 2 curators are mostly engaging with the ORG ingame and know the proper situation of if but this curators doesn't and immediately starts to question us just because few people complained to him.

I have some proofs regarding some stuff but sadly unable to send here but will send to the reviewing chief in Discord DMs.

Discord Name: dr.eug
Discord User ID: 626987483913256970

Thank you for taking the time to read this complaint.
Kazuto Kirigaya
 
Last edited:

Pablo Schmidt

Do i know u?
Deputy Chief Administrator
Joined
Jun 27, 2021
Messages
5,887
Considering all the proofs provided from both sides
Verbal for inactivity stays as there were many people asking for ads + you can add more people in ad team to solve this
Warn which was given for Leader rule 2.4 will be changed to a verbal​
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom