- Joined
- May 25, 2024
- Messages
- 151
In a hostage situation involving Ballas, NG presence was evident from the start, as ID 153837 was involved in negotiations. At timestamp 8:44, another NG soldier (ID 177022) arrives, showing that more NG members were involved. By timestamp 10:28, multiple NG soldiers (ID 170291, ID 156249, ID 163700, and ID 177022) were clearly present.
At timestamp 21:30, while the hostage vehicle was fleeing, other organizations like SAHP hesitated, fearing for the hostage’s life. Despite seeing the hostage and LEOs surrounding the Ballas car (timestamp 22:35), an NG member suggested, "let's leave," disregarding the hostage's safety.
Even if Fort Zancudo was under threat, NG should have split their forces to protect both the base and the hostage. By timestamp 23:40, no NG soldier remained near the hostage car, and ID 177022 was UB driving without tires (timestamp 23:00).
While these may be mistakes, they are recurring. Unless action is taken, this behavior won’t change. Accountability is necessary for improvement.
At timestamp 21:30, while the hostage vehicle was fleeing, other organizations like SAHP hesitated, fearing for the hostage’s life. Despite seeing the hostage and LEOs surrounding the Ballas car (timestamp 22:35), an NG member suggested, "let's leave," disregarding the hostage's safety.
Even if Fort Zancudo was under threat, NG should have split their forces to protect both the base and the hostage. By timestamp 23:40, no NG soldier remained near the hostage car, and ID 177022 was UB driving without tires (timestamp 23:00).
While these may be mistakes, they are recurring. Unless action is taken, this behavior won’t change. Accountability is necessary for improvement.