Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
  • PLEASE PAY ATTTENTION

    Before making complaint with a prefix for curator of the project please read these rules.
    1. Make complaint only in case if you already posted for high admins and they did not help you.
    2. Complaints for curator of the project ONLY for management level complaints. You can't appeal your warning or 7 days ban. You can appeal only permanent or long-term bans.

    Thank you for attention! (c) Mazhor Pluxury
Rejected
Status
Not open for further replies.
Your ID
136988
Players nickname
Alexa_Bros
Administrators nickname
Pablo_Schmidt
Date
Oct 22, 2024
Time
00:00
Proofs
https://gta5grand.com/forum/threads/844055/

Alexa Bros

Ballas On Top
Player
Joined
Feb 27, 2024
Messages
412
Dear Lebron,
I am Alexa Bros and sir I had recently made a complain about wrong decison on hassy(Link) here sir I had given all the proof regarding that a wrong decision of Mr Hassy.
Let me explain sir first of all Mr Usama said that ballas will receive punishment that is 2 warn for not providing pov in pov req and later a new rule was announced by MR usama (here is the link) and sir this rule was announce just after the punishment so the Ballas don't receive Warn but previously before this all thing ballas previous leader made complain that pov can just be opened by just replying on it and jsut by saying so mr hassy sir said that it can be open in given limit here is the proof. So the rule before was that we can open it by just saying "reopen" and if Mr Usama announced the new rule he said in very beginning that From Now on so that means that rule apply from now so according to previous rule they should get warn for their mistake

Also, Sir Ballas leader and deputy said that they didn't saw the notifications but however i had already proved in my previous thread that they are just deceiving as they were already knew about the pov req but they didn't knew that they need to provide POV when it is requested according to Capture Rule 2.33 but they were thinking that it needs to provide when the admin requests it as this proof states this if you see it according to time then it will get proved that they were knowing that they are having pov req on them. (Proof1 that shows that they were not aware of the rule)(Proof 2

So Mr Lebron, I kindly request you to See this matter and Please lead me to justice as Mr Pablo has already taken decision, but if you see proofs thoroughly you will get to know that they are just deceiving they knew they got pov req aaccording to the thing I explained in my old forum and sir according to the old rules they should get punished as the new rule was made just after they did rulebreak and the rule itself states from now on that means from now onwards. So I believe that rules are mean to Be same for everyone

Thank You,
Hoping for Postive reply
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom