Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

Rejected Request for access to evidence and review of the ban measure

Rejected
Status
Not open for further replies.
Your ID
3828
Players nickname
Jamal Fides
Administrators nickname
Loui Sana
Date
Nov 11, 2024
Time
21.00
Proofs
https://streamable.com/13k76o

nicosoul

Player
Player
Joined
Sep 28, 2024
Messages
5
Subject: Request for Access to Evidence and Review of First Cheating Ban (ID 3828)

Dear curator of the project,

I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to formally request access to the relevant evidence regarding the first cheating ban imposed on the player with ID 3828.

Reason for the Request:
I am requesting access to the evidence because I believe that the ban imposed on the player with ID 3828 is unjustified. No sufficient evidence or reasons have been provided to justify the suspension of their account. In order to clarify the situation fully and to respond to the decision, I kindly ask for access to the relevant evidence.

Case Details:

  • Player Name: [Jamal Fides #3828]
  • Incident: [Androsch Fredl banned the player with ID 3828 despite the fact that this player did not violate General Rule §4.1 (1/2). Both the player with ID 3828 and I suspect that Androsch Fredl may have been paid by another individual to carry out this ban. It is allegedly known within the community that Androsch Fredl demands €60 for a positive/negative PC check. There are also strong indications suggesting that Androsch Fredl is involved in corrupt practices.]
Evidence Requested:
I kindly request access to the following evidence related to the incident and the ban:

  • Chat logs
  • Screenshots
  • Video recordings
  • Logs, etc.
As I believe the ban was not based on sufficient or accurate grounds, and due to the suspicion of corruption involving Androsch Fredl, I hope for a thorough review of the evidence and the entire process. I kindly ask that all relevant information be disclosed to ensure a fair and transparent decision.

(Loui_Sana and Androsch Fredl I accuse Kuruptin of colluding to protect each other to avoid punishment for their actions. I argue that they both deliberately stood up for each other to ensure that neither of them would be held accountable or punished for what they had done. This mutual protection, they argue, has allowed them to escape justice. It seems as if they use each other to escape the consequences that await others in similar situations)



Best regards,
[Nico Soul]
[Jamal Fides]
[11.11.24]
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom