- Joined
- Jul 22, 2024
- Messages
- 53
Hello Dear Sam or Pablo.
I opened a forum today for GR 6.8 to player with ID 176033 and Mr. Yuta requested an extended POV while the rulebreak is clear in my POV. I told him that i think my POV proves that he violated GR 6.8 but he still rejected it saying that he doesn't 'see' any women or person doing emote while ID 176033 clearly does an inappropriate emote at timestamp 0:07 and the emote name is 'Rejoice' while I'm dead on the ground. Why did Mr. Yuta asked for an extended POV instead of just rejecting it if he didn't see any rulebreak at all? I think the person should be punished aswell the Admin who rejected it because GR 6.8 is clear in my POV and person should be punished 100% and I think this is clearly a biased decision.
Best Regard,
Jrcha Wanted
I opened a forum today for GR 6.8 to player with ID 176033 and Mr. Yuta requested an extended POV while the rulebreak is clear in my POV. I told him that i think my POV proves that he violated GR 6.8 but he still rejected it saying that he doesn't 'see' any women or person doing emote while ID 176033 clearly does an inappropriate emote at timestamp 0:07 and the emote name is 'Rejoice' while I'm dead on the ground. Why did Mr. Yuta asked for an extended POV instead of just rejecting it if he didn't see any rulebreak at all? I think the person should be punished aswell the Admin who rejected it because GR 6.8 is clear in my POV and person should be punished 100% and I think this is clearly a biased decision.
Best Regard,
Jrcha Wanted
