Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
  • PLEASE PAY ATTTENTION

    Before making complaint with a prefix for curator of the project please read these rules.
    1. Make complaint only in case if you already posted for high admins and they did not help you.
    2. Complaints for curator of the project ONLY for management level complaints. You can't appeal your warning or 7 days ban. You can appeal only permanent or long-term bans.

    Thank you for attention! (c) Mazhor Pluxury

Rejected Ban for GR 3.2 | Rocky Royal

Rejected
Status
Not open for further replies.
Your ID
167078
Players nickname
Badmash Saim
Administrators nickname
Rocky Royal
Date
Jan 9, 2025
Time
00:00
Proofs
https://imgur.com/a/zuK8jHF
B

badmash saim

Player
Player
Joined
Aug 10, 2024
Messages
65
I recently received a ban for violating rule GR 3.2 in this forum, and I wanted to ask for clarification regarding the evidence that led to the decision. The proof that was provided included a YouTube link, but when I tried accessing it, the link simply redirects me to the normal YouTube homepage and does not point to any specific video or evidence. Given that, I am unsure how the violation could have been assessed based on the link provided. Could you kindly explain how this proof was reviewed and how the decision to ban me was made? If there's any additional information or context I need to be aware of, please let me know. I want to ensure that I understand what happened and learn from this situation. If a mistake was made by the admin in this case, I believe it would be fair for them to also be held accountable for the error.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom