- Joined
- Oct 7, 2021
- Messages
- 425
To Whomever this main concern, as I am writing a compliant on a decision one of the NG Curators made as of 12.04.2023
the decision being:
The Decision being giving us a verbal for LR 2.3 Do not allow any provocative and conflict situations between the members of your organization
As from the POV provided on the threads post ID: 14348 | Corruption without Bio & FailRP (talking while Dead) I do not understand where was there any sort of Internal conflict between org members? as I was following State Rule 1.8 Laws are wrote by the government and every state organization should follow them. and this individual inside of my org wanted to violate state legislation, I gave him an order to return his gear so it didnt go further, he wanted to continue to argue, so I detained him and took him to the Armory to return his gear, what I really want to know is what kind of provocative Actions occurred during an incident of following state legislation? and it confuses us on what do we follow, do we allow people to be corrupt in our orgs and promote complete toxicity? or do we completely ignore and dismiss any acts of corruptions or any acts of toxicity in our orgs. I hope this issue is resolved as this ruins my RP of ending corruption in orgs :/
the decision being:
The Decision being giving us a verbal for LR 2.3 Do not allow any provocative and conflict situations between the members of your organization
As from the POV provided on the threads post ID: 14348 | Corruption without Bio & FailRP (talking while Dead) I do not understand where was there any sort of Internal conflict between org members? as I was following State Rule 1.8 Laws are wrote by the government and every state organization should follow them. and this individual inside of my org wanted to violate state legislation, I gave him an order to return his gear so it didnt go further, he wanted to continue to argue, so I detained him and took him to the Armory to return his gear, what I really want to know is what kind of provocative Actions occurred during an incident of following state legislation? and it confuses us on what do we follow, do we allow people to be corrupt in our orgs and promote complete toxicity? or do we completely ignore and dismiss any acts of corruptions or any acts of toxicity in our orgs. I hope this issue is resolved as this ruins my RP of ending corruption in orgs :/
