Rejected Targeting Player | 64382

[Rise LoL]

Hello again, dear admins,

Two days ago, I encountered this individual for the first time in the race turf, and they haven’t left me alone since then. In the first forum, they opened a report accusing me of using a bug. That’s fine; I didn’t know it was a bug. I accept my mistake, and since I was penalized, I didn’t object.

Approved - Bug abuse | 2255

Dear Admin Team This guy has done role breck [bug abuse] Use of this fence This fence is considered [bug abuse] { proof 1 } And this person did provoking in cc { proof 2 } And before joining he did provoking {proof 3 } I am sure that bug abuse will end because my friend was subjected to...

gta5grand.com

Yesterday, this individual opened another forum, claiming I violated rule GR 6.17 and engaged in provocation. That forum was rejected.

Rejected - 6.17 | 2255

Dear Admin Team This guy did GR 6.17 Because it was from my point of view, he is speaking from his own point of view. In his video, he is not talking, look at my video, {proof 1 } in a minute 3:03 to 3:10 he is talking but in the same minute in { proof 2 } his point of He doesn't talk This...

gta5grand.com

Today, they’ve opened yet another forum about the same issues. I play on this server to have fun and spend time. I have no intention of causing trouble with anyone. Seeing forums about the same topic for two days has given me a headache. I want to express my discomfort regarding this matter.

Pending review - Misunderstanding of the Rules | Hassn Error

Dear Admin Team This guy applied GR 6.17 because in my view he is speaking from his point of view. He doesn't talk. Watch my video {Proof 1} from minute 3:03 to 3:10 while he is speaking, but if you watch his video {Proof 2} and in the same minute He doesn't talk This overlay is considered...

gta5grand.com

Best regards,
Rise IDRIVE

 

[𝕐𝕠𝕦𝕤𝕖𝕗 𝔻ℍ𝕖𝕝𝕝𝕜𝕚𝕟𝕘𝕤]

It's not off-topic. What targeting is this? You exploited the loopholes to gain influence area and you were originally trying to provoke us in CC. You also say that everyone does this exploitation, which means you know that this is forbidden and you made an excuse for yourself (since everyone does these loopholes and does not receive punishment, this means I can do this according to what you say). Isn't this what you said and meant? When you attacked our influence, this was the first time I saw you, what targeting is this? Are you kidding me? You also tried to provoke me in the complaint I filed against you because you used server loopholes for your own benefit. I think I have the right to file a complaint against anyone who exploits server loopholes. And when there was an incomplete penalty, I filed a complaint against the administrator, not against you, but the administrator told me that a complaint against the administrator is not here in its section, and through your complaint, I think that you are the one targeting me, not me, because I do not know you and there is no hostility between us, but I reported you because you broke the server rules, and if I remain silent about the mistake, this means that you will repeat the mistake, and thus the server experience will become bad for everyone, because if every person files a complaint against you, you accuse him of targeting, this means that everyone will be afraid to file a complaint against the other, and thus the complaint system here on the site will be useless. The point that I want to clarify to you is do not exploit the fact that you received a penalty and that you broke the server rules against me, you are the one who is at fault.

 

[Markus Cartel]

Reviewing​

 

[Markus Cartel]

Rejected

There is no enough proofs for Targeting
​