Rejected L.R 3.3 + G.R 6.4 | 45666

[Hamza Bhai]

Now my students gonna teach me lol
IMG-1858 hosted at ImgBB

Athwal, you’re saying “how can you cuff 1st person,” but you’re ignoring how immunity actually works. The leader must have immunity, yes, but wrong use of that immunity leads to punishment
If someone cuffs without knowing he’s 1st person, that’s not a violation, he can be uncuffed once it’s clarified.
And let’s not forget, you were made leader and removed very early but that the separate thing. Also, sharing personal DMs publicly is a clear breach of privacy. Stop targeting others and twisting rules to defend victim, it just exposes double standards.

 

[Tushar Anand]

Now my students gonna teach me lol
IMG-1858 hosted at ImgBB

What a shameful. Your Student is teaching you The legislation be shameful Don't laugh lol laughing on Ownself what a shameful person you are..Have Some Shame.Not feeling Shame then put black colour on your face..

 

[Tushar Anand]

Did i asked From You mr/mrs whatever you are i didnt care

Did Anyone Asked You To come Here And give justification Did Someone Called You that come and Give your Justification.First See Yourself And hide Yourself Being a leader and deputy don't know the proper legislation..

 

[David Akatsuki]

Now my students gonna teach me lol
IMG-1858 hosted at ImgBB

You are lucky to learn from your Junior who actually knows the LAW
( If i would be at your place i would've asked for some more )

 

[Diego Moraled]

.

 

[Arthur Ryu]

Code of Immunity and Status Law (Immunity Code)
Code of Evidence and Investigation Law (Evidence Code)
Code of Civil and Procedural Law

Immunity Code: Articles 2.1 , 3.1 d) , 3.1 e) , 6.3
Evidence Code: Article 7.1.2 i) (re: location-based search authority, which doesn't explicitly cover SAHP HQ for First Persons)
Civil Code: Article 4.7 (re: procedure for detaining any state employee, which wasn't followed)

The LSPD Leader is a "First Person" and holds Full Legal Immunity . This status prohibits detention or arrest without specific authorization like an Order of Investigation (OI), an Order of Waiver (OW), a Special Warrant of Arrest (SWA), or a direct order from the Governor or Attorney General . Furthermore, searching a First Person is illegal without an OI or their explicit consent . The SAHP officer violated these protections by cuffing (detaining) and searching the LSPD Leader before confirming their identity and status, based only on the wearing of a balaclava. Even if the identity was initially unknown, the officer was required to release the Leader immediately upon confirmation of their First Person status. The officer also failed to follow the standard procedure for detaining any state employee, which requires contacting their High Command and the DOJ . Acting contrary to these established procedures constitutes a serious violation. Evidence obtained from the unlawful search is inadmissible

The SAHP officer acted unlawfully by detaining and searching a First Person without authorization. The LSPD Leader should file a formal complaint with the Department of Justice, providing bodycam evidence, citing violations of the Immunity Code (Unlawful Detention, Unlawful Search) and potentially Arbitrariness.

 

[Tushar Anand]

Code of Immunity and Status Law (Immunity Code)
Code of Evidence and Investigation Law (Evidence Code)
Code of Civil and Procedural Law

Immunity Code: Articles 2.1 , 3.1 d) , 3.1 e) , 6.3
Evidence Code: Article 7.1.2 i) (re: location-based search authority, which doesn't explicitly cover SAHP HQ for First Persons)
Civil Code: Article 4.7 (re: procedure for detaining any state employee, which wasn't followed)

The LSPD Leader is a "First Person" and holds Full Legal Immunity . This status prohibits detention or arrest without specific authorization like an Order of Investigation (OI), an Order of Waiver (OW), a Special Warrant of Arrest (SWA), or a direct order from the Governor or Attorney General . Furthermore, searching a First Person is illegal without an OI or their explicit consent . The SAHP officer violated these protections by cuffing (detaining) and searching the LSPD Leader before confirming their identity and status, based only on the wearing of a balaclava. Even if the identity was initially unknown, the officer was required to release the Leader immediately upon confirmation of their First Person status. The officer also failed to follow the standard procedure for detaining any state employee, which requires contacting their High Command and the DOJ . Acting contrary to these established procedures constitutes a serious violation. Evidence obtained from the unlawful search is inadmissible

The SAHP officer acted unlawfully by detaining and searching a First Person without authorization. The LSPD Leader should file a formal complaint with the Department of Justice, providing bodycam evidence, citing violations of the Immunity Code (Unlawful Detention, Unlawful Search) and potentially Arbitrariness.

A person Whose every application is rejected and have no approval has came here to teach the law lol.First of all go and learn the rules and law and try to make your forum better your every Forum has rejection.Dont teach others

 

[Diego Moraled]

A person Whose every application is rejected and have no approval has came here to teach the law lol.First of all go and learn the rules and law and try to make your forum better your every Forum has rejection.Dont teach others

​

 

[Arthur Ryu]

A person Whose every application is rejected and have no approval has came here to teach the law lol.First of all go and learn the rules and law and try to make your forum better your every Forum has rejection.Dont teach others

Go To government discord server and check DOJ logs See who is arthur Ryu​

 

[Erwin Ryu]

Go To government discord server and check DOJ logs See who is arthur Ryu​

I am first person idiot

 

[Tushar Anand]

Go To government discord server and check DOJ logs See who is arthur Ryu​

If I go there and see there will be only Shit like here you have done.I don't Want .Don't tell this things to anyone else otherwise they will vomit on your face

 

[Erwin Ryu]

If I go there and see there will be only Shit like here you have done.I don't Want .Don't tell this things to anyone else otherwise they will vomit on your face

btw you can give reply with your real forum account ! Coming with new / twink forum accounts and shitting in grand rp's forum section doesn't smell good .

 

[Michael Smart]

Code of Immunity and Status Law (Immunity Code)
Code of Evidence and Investigation Law (Evidence Code)
Code of Civil and Procedural Law

Immunity Code: Articles 2.1 , 3.1 d) , 3.1 e) , 6.3
Evidence Code: Article 7.1.2 i) (re: location-based search authority, which doesn't explicitly cover SAHP HQ for First Persons)
Civil Code: Article 4.7 (re: procedure for detaining any state employee, which wasn't followed)

The LSPD Leader is a "First Person" and holds Full Legal Immunity . This status prohibits detention or arrest without specific authorization like an Order of Investigation (OI), an Order of Waiver (OW), a Special Warrant of Arrest (SWA), or a direct order from the Governor or Attorney General . Furthermore, searching a First Person is illegal without an OI or their explicit consent . The SAHP officer violated these protections by cuffing (detaining) and searching the LSPD Leader before confirming their identity and status, based only on the wearing of a balaclava. Even if the identity was initially unknown, the officer was required to release the Leader immediately upon confirmation of their First Person status. The officer also failed to follow the standard procedure for detaining any state employee, which requires contacting their High Command and the DOJ . Acting contrary to these established procedures constitutes a serious violation. Evidence obtained from the unlawful search is inadmissible

The SAHP officer acted unlawfully by detaining and searching a First Person without authorization. The LSPD Leader should file a formal complaint with the Department of Justice, providing bodycam evidence, citing violations of the Immunity Code (Unlawful Detention, Unlawful Search) and potentially Arbitrariness.

Immunity code
2.1.4 If any Citizen of the State claims to be a First Person or claims they have Full Legal Immunity they must immediately show their Badge/ID in order to prove their Claim. a) If a Citizen does not immediately prove their Claim that they are a First Person when it is required then no provisions of Full Immunity Status will apply and they may be Detained until their Identity and status of Full Legal Immunity is proved.

Claiming to be a 1st person or LEO means nothing, until he has shown a badge/ID. Looking at the Bodycam given, He was wearing a balaclava which is a state issued item for those reasons 2.17.5 would apply. SAHP officer had probable cause to detain him and search him. As no proof of having full immunity was not provided at that time.

1.4.1 Full Legal Immunity applies at all times, regardless of whether the First Person is On-Duty or Off-Duty. a) A First Person is not considered “Always On-Duty” and is only considered On-Duty and obliged to perform their Duties to the State or respond to situations when they are formally On-Duty and therefore expected to perform those Duties.

Claiming that a 1st person is "always on duty" is not true, and are not allowed to carry org stuff while off duty.

 

[Danny Riich]

its is a clear leader rule break why kids defending lamfo no scope

 

[Preyas]

Actually he is the worst leader in the whole history of grand rp, i cant even get a hod even hod's are full.
It is a case of pure favourtism and corruption.

 

[David Akatsuki]

its is a clear leader rule break why kids defending lamfo no scope

 

[Danny Riich]

That's why they are kids

for real

 

[tayyabramzan]

Code of Immunity and Status Law (Immunity Code)
Code of Evidence and Investigation Law (Evidence Code)
Code of Civil and Procedural Law

Immunity Code: Articles 2.1 , 3.1 d) , 3.1 e) , 6.3
Evidence Code: Article 7.1.2 i) (re: location-based search authority, which doesn't explicitly cover SAHP HQ for First Persons)
Civil Code: Article 4.7 (re: procedure for detaining any state employee, which wasn't followed)

The LSPD Leader is a "First Person" and holds Full Legal Immunity . This status prohibits detention or arrest without specific authorization like an Order of Investigation (OI), an Order of Waiver (OW), a Special Warrant of Arrest (SWA), or a direct order from the Governor or Attorney General . Furthermore, searching a First Person is illegal without an OI or their explicit consent . The SAHP officer violated these protections by cuffing (detaining) and searching the LSPD Leader before confirming their identity and status, based only on the wearing of a balaclava. Even if the identity was initially unknown, the officer was required to release the Leader immediately upon confirmation of their First Person status. The officer also failed to follow the standard procedure for detaining any state employee, which requires contacting their High Command and the DOJ . Acting contrary to these established procedures constitutes a serious violation. Evidence obtained from the unlawful search is inadmissible

The SAHP officer acted unlawfully by detaining and searching a First Person without authorization. The LSPD Leader should file a formal complaint with the Department of Justice, providing bodycam evidence, citing violations of the Immunity Code (Unlawful Detention, Unlawful Search) and potentially Arbitrariness.

Come on, Arthur I honestly don’t know how you got your Lawyer License if this is your assessment of the case. I’ll quote only one article from the Immunity Code, which is more than enough to clarify everything:

2.1.4 If any Citizen of the State claims to be a First Person or claims they have Full Legal Immunity, they must immediately show their Badge/ID in order to prove their claim.
a) If a Citizen does not immediately prove their claim that they are a First Person when it is required, then no provisions of Full Immunity Status will apply, and they may be detained until their identity and status of Full Legal Immunity are proved.

No need for any other articles this one alone makes it clear: Immunity only applies once the identity and status are proven.

The SAHP officer acted completely within the law, as the LSPD Chief was wearing a balaclava in civilian clothing while visiting SAHP HQ. The officer immediately released him once his identity was confirmed. Yet, LSPD Leader continued to abuse his position, flex his immunity and throw insults and even passing illegal revolver to SAHP officer saying I'll see you in Court. He violated Leader Rules and GR 6.4.

And let’s be real what is a leader of a State Organization doing in civilian clothes, wearing a balaclava and carrying state-issued items inside another Department’s HQ knowing that it's against the law? It clearly shows his intentions were not good, but purely to provoke conflict and toxicity.

 

[Harry Potterrr]

 

[Jack Amphetamine]

A Person who is a DA for LSPD Doesnt Even Know the laws