- Joined
- Mar 5, 2025
- Messages
- 47
Dear Higher-Ups,
I would like to bring to your attention multiple rule violations committed by members of SAHP during a recent incident. Please review the details below:
1. First Rule Break – (SR 2.6) (Time Stamp : 00:48)
According to SR 2.6, no state organization, including SAHP, is permitted to obstruct or interfere with a government inspection. In the provided POV, SAHP officers were seen preventing a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) inspection authorized by the Government, which constitutes a direct breach of SR 2.6.
2. Second Rule Break (SR 1.8) – (Evidence Code 1.10.2) (Time Stamp : 00:20)
As per Evidence Code 1.10.2, the classification of evidence must not restrict access to authorized government officials. The clause explicitly states that evidence cannot be classified in a way that excludes:
The Governor,
The Attorney General,
Supreme Court Judges presiding over related cases,
Leaders of State Organizations or Heads of Government Departments (e.g., the Head of Homeland Security).
This confirms that the Head of Homeland Security has full authority to conduct such inspections — not necessarily the Minister. Therefore, SAHP’s refusal to cooperate represents a violation of this provision.
3. Third Rule Break – (CL) (Time Stamp : 2:42)
During a critical situation, ID 48621 deliberately he Did a code A
Given the above evidence and rule references, I request that appropriate disciplinary action be taken against the SAHP personnel involved. Their actions directly undermined lawful authority and the operational integrity of a government inspection.
Thank you for Reviewing
I would like to bring to your attention multiple rule violations committed by members of SAHP during a recent incident. Please review the details below:
1. First Rule Break – (SR 2.6) (Time Stamp : 00:48)
According to SR 2.6, no state organization, including SAHP, is permitted to obstruct or interfere with a government inspection. In the provided POV, SAHP officers were seen preventing a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) inspection authorized by the Government, which constitutes a direct breach of SR 2.6.
2. Second Rule Break (SR 1.8) – (Evidence Code 1.10.2) (Time Stamp : 00:20)
As per Evidence Code 1.10.2, the classification of evidence must not restrict access to authorized government officials. The clause explicitly states that evidence cannot be classified in a way that excludes:
The Governor,
The Attorney General,
Supreme Court Judges presiding over related cases,
Leaders of State Organizations or Heads of Government Departments (e.g., the Head of Homeland Security).
This confirms that the Head of Homeland Security has full authority to conduct such inspections — not necessarily the Minister. Therefore, SAHP’s refusal to cooperate represents a violation of this provision.
3. Third Rule Break – (CL) (Time Stamp : 2:42)
During a critical situation, ID 48621 deliberately he Did a code A
Given the above evidence and rule references, I request that appropriate disciplinary action be taken against the SAHP personnel involved. Their actions directly undermined lawful authority and the operational integrity of a government inspection.
Thank you for Reviewing
