On consideration Pov req | 365227,419692,427939

[kevin afton]

I believe that the individual with ID 419692,427939 struck me in a strange manner at 0:14, and I would like their perspective. Additionally, at 1:33, I believe that the individual with ID 365227 entered a restricted area using illegal techniques, and I would like their perspective.

 

[Frooz Afton]

.

 

[Sergio Saint]

Requesting POV ID has 419692 12 hours to provide POV of this event ID has 42793912 hours to provide POV of this event ID has 365227 12 hours to provide POV of this event ​

 

[Frooz Afton]

.

 

[Sergio Saint]

I dont think a pov request like that would be accepted there are two people in front of you and theyre normally shooting at you with a shotgun

You have 11 hours to post your pov as its been an hour.

 

[kevin afton]

I want a closed

 

[Frooz Afton]

.

 

[Frooz Afton]

You have 11 hours to post your pov as its been an hour.

this forum has been closed there is no any video Sergio Saint

 

[Leo TouchBlue]

sirr he want to closed i sended pov to another forum

 

[ACE_ERROR]

hm

 

[zorox dracula]

this forum has been closed there is no any video Sergio Saint

Once a POV has been officially requested, the related video must not be removed from YouTube. Deleting the video after a POV request can result in a forum warning, and the player who was asked to provide the POV may face disciplinary action under ER 1.7 if they fail to submit it within the required timeframe. After a POV is requested, the case cannot simply be closed at the player’s discretion.

It appears that in some instances, players may have resolved these situations by offering (IC) money or free items, potentially to avoid further scrutiny. I believe this undermines the integrity of the rules and sets a concerning precedent.

I respectfully request that senior administrators review the relevant logs to ensure that all such cases have been handled appropriately and in accordance with server policies.

 

[Frooz Afton]

I didn't make any monetary offer; the person closed the forum because they understood I was right, and it's forbidden for you to write criticisms on the forum since you have no connection or relation to this matter.

 

[zorox dracula]

Here is the owners original pov :

 

[Frooz Afton]

And as you can see, a separate forum has been created for unfair players, and the forum has been moved there. I would appreciate it if you didn't speak without knowing the facts.

Once a POV has been officially requested, the related video must not be removed from YouTube. Deleting the video after a POV request can result in a forum warning, and the player who was asked to provide the POV may face disciplinary action under ER 1.7 if they fail to submit it within the required timeframe. After a POV is requested, the case cannot simply be closed at the player’s discretion.

It appears that in some instances, players may have resolved these situations by offering (IC) money or free items, potentially to avoid further scrutiny. I believe this undermines the integrity of the rules and sets a concerning precedent.

I respectfully request that senior administrators review the relevant logs to ensure that all such cases have been handled appropriately and in accordance with server policies.

 

[Frooz Afton]

Here is the owners original pov :

It's very clear you don't know the rules, please read the rules before you come here. You have no connection to this forum, so your account will receive a warning, just so you know.

 

[Frooz Afton]

And I repeat, I didn't offer any money or anything else. He saw that I was right, and that's why another forum was opened for those who were in the wrong.

 

[kevin afton]

I found the person with ID 427939 innocent, so I opened a separate forum for this.
forum:On consideration - Pov req | 365227,419692

 

[zorox dracula]

And as you can see, a separate forum has been created for unfair players, and the forum has been moved there. I would appreciate it if you didn't speak without knowing the facts.

This is not the actual reason. You are the only one who does not have a POV for the event in question, while the other two involved parties do. You contacted him via Discord and asked him to file a new complaint in an attempt to avoid the consequences. This appears to be an effort to bypass the rules and escape the penalty.

However, as per ER 1.7, providing a POV is mandatory. Failure to do so results in a 30-day ban.

If I have gone off-topic in any way, I accept any punishment deemed appropriate by the admin. I leave the final decision to the reviewing admin and request that this case be handled according to standard procedures.

 

[zorox dracula]

That's why this forum clearly shows that you doesn't have pov Pending review - Wrong Decision POV Req | Sergio Saint

 

[zorox dracula]

It's very clear you don't know the rules, please read the rules before you come here. You have no connection to this forum, so your account will receive a warning, just so you know.

Who are you to lecture others about the rules when you yourself failed to save your POV, which is a direct violation of ER 1.7? If you can’t consistently provide your POV, then you shouldn’t be participating in events at all. Please ensure you follow the rules yourself before pointing fingers at others.