Reviewed LR 1.7 | Government

[Mark Thrust]

Good afternoon Admins,

I would like to raise a complaint regarding my recent removal from government following a statement to the public about an executive order I as SCJ found to be unconstitutional.
I believe this was the reason I got removed from the organisation OOC without any IC process and was removed from org while not in city where is the RP in that.

From my perspective, I as Supreme Court Justice have the right to Judicial Review any and all executive orders to make sure they are constitutional and as you are fully aware no branch of government is above the constitution. that means the executive order was given out illegally and should be nullified. All I did, was make a statement, IRL as Scj we would directly nullify the executive order, since this is an RP server and I cant just revoke governors orders I made a statement that did not in fact revoke the order, but just made it clear that the supreme courts did not agree with this executive order. I feel I was fired from my position for doing my job as I should.

My intention at the time was to calm down an escalating situation, as the circumstances were not good for the citizens involved. I acted in what I believed was the best interest of maintaining stability and preventing further conflict. Additionally, I was never informed of the specific reason for my removal, either in-character or through government mails. I was also removed while I was not even present in the city, meaning I had no prior knowledge that such action was being taken or the reasoning behind it. Because of this, the decision feels unfair and lacks transparency. I would appreciate clarification on the exact law/rule or Executive Order that I allegedly violated, as well as the reasoning behind the decision to remove me without any prior communication. Furthermore, while speaking with Nate in direct messages, he mentioned that the curators are upset with me. If that is indeed the case, I would like to understand the reason, as I have not knowingly done anything that would create trouble or instability for the organization. If curators are upset due to in-character situations, I believe it raises concerns about OOC involvement in IC matters. I respectfully request clarification regarding my removal, the specific law/rule or Executive Order that I violated, and transparency regarding the circumstances surrounding this situation.

Also im unsure who actually removed me.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

 

[Nova Fedorov]

Today at ooc chat, I write "This term government is so much nicer that some people dont need to give any exam but can.become dcj then scj also the head of DOJ dont know how to revoke law licence" for this reason governor kick me from org. Proof:

https://imgur.com/a/QVCK1Kq

as i told that OOC chat for fun, i dont think so, he can take action ICly, also, he revoked my licence when he can't do it, as i know.
Proof of revoking lawyer licence:

As LR1.7 i hope he didn't take the permission from the Senior Curator to fire me.

 

[Taco Smoke]

Reviewing​

 

[Taco Smoke]

Reviewed.

After reviewing both your side and that of the Government, here are a few things that I would like to bring to your notice

Lets start off first with Server Rule

- LR 1.7 states "The leader of the organization has the right to dismiss employees of his organization if he has lost any confidence in them with the senior curators approval."
- However, LR 1.7 is not directly applicable in your case because the situation concerns the conduct and misuse of authority of a constitutional judicial role (SCJ in this case), NOT a routine organizational dismissal based solely on loss of confidence within a standard faction hierarchy.

This situation should've entirely been handled ICly.

Coming to the IC Factor

- Judicial review must be exercised through formal court proceedings or rulings, not through unilateral public statements by an individual judge.
- The PSGA does not grant Supreme Court Justices authority to directly intervene in executive governance outside established judicial procedure.
- Immunity provisions under Article 10 protect officials from criminal prosecution, not from administrative removal from the organization if the governor had a valid reason for it.
- The Governor retains administrative authority over the Government organization structure as per §3.1 of the PSGA as long as they have a valid reason of dismissal which in your case they had a strong reason.
- The PSGA does not establish a specific judicial or impeachment procedure governing removal from a government organization position.

Lastly, Your own statement confirms that no formal judicial ruling or review was issued and that the action taken was a personal public statement rather than an exercise of judicial authority.