I strongly object to this case being evaluated based on an incomplete and out-of-context video.
The submitted POV is less than 1 minute long and completely omits the events leading up to the incident. Prior to this situation, we were clearly provoked near the church area, and the individuals involved then fled into the house. This is a critical part of the context and has been deliberately excluded from the video.
Our raid on the house did not happen randomly; it was a continuation of an ongoing roleplay scenario. However, the opposing party is attempting to mislead the administration by only sharing footage that benefits them.
Submitting an incomplete POV is clearly misleading. For a fair evaluation, I request:
- A continuous and uncut POV,
- Covering at least 3–5 minutes prior to the incident.
Otherwise, any judgment made will be biased and inaccurate.
It is not fair to take action based on a one-sided and trimmed video. No decision should be made until a full and proper recording is provided.